Cannabis Ruderalis


(add requestview requests)


Have created over 70 article mainly related to Indian entertainment topics. Having the right would benefit in efforts saving of new page reviewers. I don't mind getting my creation reviewed, I can always seek guidance regarding my creation if in doubt. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What is your understanding that needs to happen when another editor tags one of the articles created by you with a maintenance tag, User:C1K98V? Schwede66 18:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi @Schwede66, I hope you're doing well. Coming to your question, it usually means that they have identified some issues with the article that need to be addressed. These maintenance tags are used to highlight areas of the article that need improvement, such as issues with the article's tone, structure, sourcing, or content. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Is it something that you feel you have any responsibility to resolve, User:C1K98V? Schwede66 07:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Schwede66 see Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and improving the quality of articles is a collective effort. If an article created by me is tagged for maintenance by an editor then it's my responsibility and I try to update and fix it, discuss with the editor on the article talkpage etc. Honestly, my intend always is to resolve the issue, sometimes I succeed in it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't feel comfortable declining this outright, but this user has had a CCI opened and closed on them twice (Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/C1K98V) and received a final warning for copyright violations in May 2022. I think there is a benefit of community review for their articles. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 23:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Moneytrees I have always been transparent will stand by my comments and was blocked previously. But alot of things have changed since then, I'm more curious to find copyright edit and ask for revdel. I understand your concern, and I agree that community review can have many benefits, especially in cases where there have been previous violations. By allowing the community to review my articles, we can ensure that any potential copyright issues are identified and addressed promptly. This can also help me to learn from mistakes and improve my future contributions to the community. Therefore, I believe that providing an opportunity for community review is a positive step forward. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done per above. – Joe (talk) 08:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I have created several articles and my focus is on creating new articles. I understand that autopatrolled right helps lessen workload on new page reviewers. I humbly request this permission as I will continue to create new articles. Warmest regards to all editors doing the hard work of building this encyclopedia. Hatelove111 (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Undercoverclassicist creates well expanded articles and I recommend them for autopatrolled. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Automated comment This user has created roughly 16 articles. MusikBot talk 20:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done, doesn't meet the minimum criteria. – Joe (talk) 08:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Has created almost a hundred articles and none was deleted. The majority of the ones I checked, were well expanded. I recommend them for autopatrolled.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done, thanks for the suggestion. – Joe (talk) 08:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Hildreth gazzard

Has created nearly 1000 articles. A handful have been deleted after PROD/AFD, but the vast majority are good. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Leave a Reply