Admins: If I have clearly erred in one of my admin actions, or my rationale for the action no longer applies, please don't hesitate to reverse it. I have no objection to my actions being reversed, as long you leave me a polite note explaining what you did and why.* Thanks. *This does not apply to arbitration enforcement actions or oversight blocks; sorry.

This is the second attempt by InedibleHulk to recruit users to make edits on their behalf. ––FormalDude (talk) 06:40, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Apologies for the belated response. I'm not sure it's worth getting hot under the collar about. It's possibly unwise but the edits are fairly trivial. Even if I were to lose sleep over it, I doubt any action would survive a community review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:00, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

HJ, would you consider a warning? IH may not know this behavior is unwise. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:03, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Please range block me under /16 range for three months.197.3.245.242 (talk) 04:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

I am sending this message on another device to request you to unblock my account for another.

Was hoping you could unblock my account of 2600:387:15:1416:0:0:0:5. You blocked me after I made an edit to a shark finning article a few months ago. The edit was of good faith, detailing how the U.S. just a passed a law to ban the practice, and I added sources. I have been following this topic for a few years now and have edited the page before. I am not sure of the reason for the block. I went on to make another edit with good-intentions today but saw the block.

I apologize if this is not the correct way to submit an unblock request. If you could point me in the right direction to do so it would be much apricated.

~~~~Editor of good-faith 2601:81:8402:3EF0:74EC:EF5C:6F53:2D7C (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for unbanning me.

2601:81:8402:3EF0:48D1:F2D5:F159:E202 (talk) 01:53, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]