1923 United States Supreme Court case
Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued February 27, 1923 Decided March 12, 1923 | |
Full case name | Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles |
Citations | 261 U.S. 326 (more) 43 S. Ct. 365; 67 L. Ed. 680 |
Case history | |
Prior | 279 F. 1018 (2d Cir. 1922) |
Holding | |
The statute intends that an executor, there being no widow, widower, or child, shall have the same right to renew a copyright for a second term as his testator might have exercised were he still alive. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Holmes, joined by a unanimous court |
Laws applied | |
Copyright Act of 1909 |
Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles, 261 U.S. 326 (1923), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the statute intends that an executor, there being no widow, widower, or child, shall have the same right to renew a copyright for a second term as his testator might have exercised had he continued to survive.[1]
This case was reaffirmed in Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc..[2]
References
[edit]External links
[edit]- Text of Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles, 261 U.S. 326 (1923) is available from: Cornell Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress