Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin

/pol/
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect
Type of site
4chan imageboard
Available inEnglish
OwnerHiroyuki Nishimura
Founder(s)Christopher Poole
URL4chan.org/pol/catalog Edit this at Wikidata
CommercialYes
RegistrationOptional
LaunchedOctober 23, 2011; 10 years ago (2011-10-23)
Current statusOnline
Part of a series on
Antisemitism
Yellowbadge logo.svg
Definitions
Manifestations
Antisemitic canards
Antisemitic publications
Antisemitism on the Internet
Prominent figures
Persecution
Opposition
Category

/pol/, short for "Politically Incorrect",[1] is an anonymous political discussion imageboard on 4chan.[2][3][4] As of 2020, it was one of 4chan's most active boards.[5] It has had a substantial impact on Internet culture while acting as a platform for extremism;[6][7] the board is notable for its widespread racist, white supremacist, antisemitic, anti-Muslim, misogynist, and anti-LGBT content.[18] /pol/ has been described as one of the "[centers] of 4chan mobilization", a title previously considered to have belonged solely to /b/.[16]

Overview[edit]

Screenshot of the front (catalog) page of /pol/ in December 2019, with each discussion thread indicated by an image

Common /pol/ content involves discussion of current news. A 2020 report categorized about 36% of news sources frequently posted to the board by American users as "junk news", a category that includes sources considered to be propaganda, sensationalist, or conspiracy theory content. Outside of traditional news sources, users also commonly rely on alternative media such as YouTube commentary as a source of news.[19][5]

Flags are displayed on each post. A national flag corresponding to the user's geographic location (based on their IP address, which could be manipulated using a proxy server) may be displayed. Alternatively, users may select a "meme flag" (also referred to as a "troll flag"), corresponding to various political identifiers.[1][13][20] However, these are not common per amount of posts—the "Nazi" meme flag was the most commonly used meme flag in a 2020 analysis, while posts with an American geographic location were about 57 times more common (and appeared the most of any flag).[1]

Each post also has a unique ID attached, which is likewise associated with the user's IP address.[21] However, these unique IDs will only tend to remain attached to a user per a single thread, as they are not persistent between multiple threads.[22][23] Threads have a limited lifespan, effectively prioritizing newer content.[21]

Much of the content on /pol/ relies heavily on Internet memes to further spread ideas.[24][12] Many have questioned the sincerity of users on /pol/ as possible trolls.[25][26] According to Mic, "On a place like /pol/, there's no clear delineation between sincerity, irony and cynicism."[27] First Monday commented that "The creation of character-based archetypes is common on /pol/ and makes this online space semi-performative and semi-authentic."[13]

While 4chan's /pol/ board is the most popular board under the "/pol/" name, versions on other websites have existed. These include Kohlchan, 8chan (later 8kun), 16chan, Shitchan, and Endchan, with some less popular "/pol/" themed boards accessible through the Tor network on sites such as 9chan and Neinchan.[3] However, 4chan's /pol/ board has become increasingly "synonymous with 4chan as a whole", according to New Media & Society.[28]

History[edit]

Prior to the creation of /pol/, there were two boards intended for discussing news that had been added and removed from the site. The first of these was /n/, which was added on 8 April 2006. It replaced /n/'s previous topic of animals and nature, which was moved to the /an/ board. /n/'s topic was changed to transportation on 19 February 2008, without moving the news topic to another board, effectively removing it.[29]

Another news board, /new/, was later added on 25 January 2010. It was deleted a year later on 17 January 2011.[29] According to 4chan's creator and ex-administrator Christopher Poole, this was because it had "devolved into /stormfront/".[30][31][32] This was comparing /new/ to Stormfront, which is the oldest and largest Holocaust-denialist white supremacist site.[32][33] The /new/ board was the direct predecessor to /pol/.[34]

/pol/ was created on October 23, 2011.[16][35][29] According to Christine Lagorio-Chafkin, /pol/ was created by "4chan's founder [...] to siphon off and contain the overtly xenophobic and racist comments and memes from other wings of 4chan."[36] This has led to /pol/ acquiring the nickname of a "containment board", because its purpose is to keep far-right and generally political content off of 4chan's other boards.[32][8][6]

Notable events[edit]

Screenshots of Trayvon Martin's hacked social media accounts were initially posted to /pol/ in 2015.[37][38]

After the Umpqua Community College shooting, /pol/ began attempting to circulate on social media claims that comedian Sam Hyde was the perpetrator of a mass shooting event or terrorist attack. They repeated this after several other mass shootings, in attempts to troll mainstream news outlets into reporting Hyde as the attacker.[39] According to BBC News, CNN mistakenly included Hyde's image on their coverage of the Umpqua shooting.[40] After the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, a Google search for a different man's name returned a /pol/ thread in the "top stories" section falsely identifying him as the shooter. A spokesperson for Google said that the thread had appeared because search queries and news about the man were rare, allowing for the thread to appear in results, but that the thread did not appear in broader searches about the Las Vegas shooting.[41][42]

On April 6, 2016, users on the board's /sg/ (short for Syria General) thread collaborated with a Russian Twitter account to locate an encampment of Syrian rebels.[43][44] The account then claimed to have forwarded the location to the Russian Ministry of Defense.[43] The board's users also allegedly located an ISIS training camp near Mosul, Iraq. The users coordinated on Telegram as well as on 4chan.[45]

In summer 2016, /pol/ users coordinated "Operation Google", a campaign to associate the name "Google" with the ethnic slur "nigger".[10][46] This was undertaken in response to Google's Jigsaw subsidiary developing Conversation AI, a tool made to recognize offensive language.[46][47]

One of the most popular memes found on the board during the period surrounding the 2016 US presidential election was Pepe the Frog, which has been deemed a hate symbol in some contexts by the Anti-Defamation League due to its use in uniforms, places, and people associated with Nazism, the Ku Klux Klan, and antisemitism.[48][49][50] Many /pol/ users favored Donald Trump during his 2016 United States presidential campaign.[8] Some right-wing memes about the presidential campaign originated on the board.[51] Upon his election, a /pol/ moderator embedded a pro-Trump video at the top of all of the board's pages.[52][53][54][55]

Users of /pol/ engaged in coordinated attacks on LaBeouf, Rönkkö & Turner's HEWILLNOTDIVIDE.US, a 2017 performance art project made to protest Donald Trump's presidency.[32][56] Some users on the board suggested committing acts of violence against participants in the art project.[32] Users also organized the It's OK to be white poster campaign the same year.[57][58]

In 2017, users of /pol/ coordinated a campaign to convince mainstream news organizations that the OK gesture was a white power symbol; the OK gesture was later used meta-ironically by white supremacists.[59]

In October 2017, a tripcode user referred to as "Q" began posting on 4chan's /pol/ board in what would become the QAnon conspiracy theory and political movement. Q soon moved to 8chan.[60]

In 2019, 4chan and 8chan were temporarily blocked by internet service providers in Australia and New Zealand for containing videos of the Christchurch mosque shootings.[61][62] Before the shootings, the shooter posted on 8chan's /pol/ board.[3][63][64] The suspected perpetrators of the Poway synagogue shooting and the El Paso shooting also allegedly posted their manifestos there.[63][64] In late 2019, a poster campaign coordinated on the board received some local and regional news coverage. The posters stated, "Islam was RIGHT about women".[65]

In late February and early March 2021, users on /pol/ boosted a social media trend called "super straight", which they said was a new sexuality describing heterosexuals who would never have a sexual relationship with transgender people.[66][67] The trend began with a later-deleted TikTok video by a user who said he had created the term because he was tired of being called transphobic.[68][67] The Daily Dot stated that "trolls, bigots, and trans-exclusionary radical feminists" were "reframing their harassment of transgender people" through this trend.[69] The trend spread to other platforms as well, including Twitter, and 4chan users were eager to "red pill" those in the Generation Z age group, create division among LGBTQ communities, and use the language of LGBTQ rights to troll leftists. Some 4chan members used Nazi symbols in their symbolism, including the logo of Adolf Hitler's Schutzstaffel, which also used SS as an acronym. Colors associated with "super straight", often used in the form of flags, were black and orange.[17][69][67]

In a manifesto allegedly written by the accused perpetrator of the 2022 Buffalo shooting, the author said he was introduced to his far-right ideology (including a belief in the Great Replacement conspiracy theory) through browsing /pol/, beginning in May 2020.[70][14]

The day after the 2022 Robb Elementary School shooting, Representative Paul Gosar (R-AZ) falsely claimed that its perpetrator was a "transsexual leftist illegal alien" in a tweet, which was taken down two hours after it was posted.[71] The claim was based on a rumor started by an anonymous poster on /pol/, who posted the Reddit account of a transgender woman and claimed that she was the shooter; photos of the woman were widely shared on social media, including in conservative Facebook groups, where she was also erroneously identified as the shooter and harassed.[72][73]

Reception[edit]

/pol/ has been characterized as predominantly racist and sexist, with many of its posts taking explicitly alt-right and neo-Nazi points of view. In particular, the board is infamous for the prevalence of antisemitic threads and memes.[74][9][75][76][77][8] One common antisemitic meme on /pol/ is the Happy Merchant.[7][12][78] Southern Poverty Law Center regards /pol/'s rhetorical style as widely emulated by white supremacist websites such as The Daily Stormer; the Stormer's editor, Andrew Anglin, concurred.[9]

As a potential honeypot[edit]

Many have speculated whether the website is kept online as a honeypot for far-right groups, or to monitor extremists.[79][80] In 2015, an Australian Department of Defence graduate used /pol/ to share classified information, only to be caught by another former Department of Defence worker browsing the site.[81] Within /pol/, suspected agents of various intelligence communities are called "Glowniggers",[82] a reference to the computer programmer Terry A. Davis who said "The CIA Niggers glow in the dark, you can see them if you're driving, you just run them over, that's what you do."[79][83] Because of this, suspicious posts are deemed to be "glowing" and "glowposting" is a common phrase on the forum.[79]

Alleged moderator racism[edit]

In 2020, several past and current moderators spoke to Vice Media's Motherboard about what they perceived as racist intent behind /pol/ and 4chan as a whole. They described how the manager of 4chan's volunteer "janitors", a moderator known as RapeApe, wishes to generate right-wing discussion on /pol/ and has dissuaded janitors from banning users for racism. Additionally, they noted how janitors were often fired whenever they held left-wing opinions. Hiroyuki Nishimura was described as letting RapeApe have full control of the site. Neither Nishimura nor RapeApe responded to Vice Media's requests for comment, but RapeApe did, however, provide a video of two naked men dancing.[84]

Analysis[edit]

Influence[edit]

A 2017 quantitative analysis found that /pol/ was an important influencer of news content on Twitter, with the board contributing 3% of mainstream news links and 1.96% of alternative news links on Twitter (as a fraction of all links co-appearing on Twitter, Reddit, and 4chan). The researchers concluded that "'fringe' communities often succeed in spreading alternative news to mainstream social networks".[85]

Content and userbase[edit]

According to a 2017 longitudinal study, using a dataset of over 8 million posts, /pol/ is a diverse ecosystem with users well-distributed around the world. The percentage of posts containing hate speech ranges from 4.15% (e.g., in Indonesia, Arab countries) to 30% (e.g., China, Bahamas, Cyprus). Elevated use of hate speech is seen in Western European countries (e.g., Italy, Spain, Greece, and France).[8] They also examined raids performed by /pol/ users against other platforms, particularly YouTube videos. They found that when a link to a YouTube video was posted on a /pol/ thread, an increase in hateful comments appeared on the video's comments section for the duration of that thread's existence.[86][87] Another study found that adjusted for Internet-using population per country, users were most commonly from Canada, Australia, the United States, Ireland and Croatia. Users from other countries in Europe were also found to be common.[1]

Following the announcement of a COVID-19 lockdown occurring in Wuhan, China, in January 2020, an international team of researchers noted an increase of anti-Chinese sentiment and anti-Asian slurs on /pol/ in reaction to the events surrounding the virus outbreak, in an analysis that also examined similar activity on Twitter.[88][11] This included calls for violence against Chinese people.[11] According to a 2020 report by the British charity Community Security Trust, many threads contain "explicit calls for Jews to be killed".[89]

A study with data collected from April 2020 to June 2020 and published in Perspectives on Terrorism in February 2021 analyzed the popularity and content present on different /pol/ boards. To analyze board content, they examined which word sets were most common per board. They found that schisms were characteristic of this subculture, with splinter communities being less popular and more extreme on average. For example, discussion on 8kun's /pol/ board contained more racial content than did 4chan's much more popular /pol/ board, which hosted racist content as well. Neinchan, hosted on the Tor network, was indicated as having among the most extreme /pol/ boards, albeit with low traffic. The researchers indicated that academic work examining this subculture of far-right imageboards was lacking.[3]

In a study published in January 2021, researchers found that there were escalating amounts of antisemitic rhetoric used on /pol/ after mass shooting events, particularly the Christchurch mosque shootings and the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting.[13] Another study found that activity on the board more generally tended to increase rapidly following mass shootings committed by right-wing extremists.[64]

A July 2021 analysis of climate change discussion on /pol/ found that there were large contingents of users who discussed the topic using antisemitic, racist and conspiracy theorist themes. It also found a growing trend of "climate nationalism" (i.e. the integration of nationalist and racist beliefs with narratives about the occurrence of climate change) among the board's users who participated in these conversations. These discussions still featured prominent amounts of debate concerning the scientific aspects of climate change, such as academic publishing and the validity (or lack thereof) of the scientific consensus on climate change. However, a trend was observed where, over time, this was a slowly declining feature of such discussions.[6]

Research design[edit]

A study published in New Media & Society in January 2022 discussed the interactions between /pol/ users and the researchers who study their community. The study observed the reactions of /pol/ users to a research workshop dedicated to studying them. The researchers suggested that studies that aim to learn about the /pol/ community and its users should take into account (for research design purposes) that they may be aware of observation by external entities, "rather than seeing it as a community that can be externally observed without consequence." They also suggested that, "[A]cademics may be influenced by knowing that 4chan is watching. /pol/, and associated communities, have long been associated with attacks on those trying to study or criticise them..."[7]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d Papasavva, Antonis; Zannettou, Savvas; Cristofaro, Emiliano De; Stringhini, Gianluca; Blackburn, Jeremy (26 May 2020). "Raiders of the Lost Kek: 3.5 Years of Augmented 4chan Posts from the Politically Incorrect Board". Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. 14: 885–894. arXiv:2001.07487. ISSN 2334-0770.
  2. ^ a b c d Merrin, William (2019). "President Troll: Trump, 4Chan and Memetic Warfare". In Happer, Catherine; Hoskins, Andrew; Merrin, William (eds.). Trump's Media War. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 201–226. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94069-4_13. ISBN 978-3-319-94069-4. S2CID 158349744.
  3. ^ a b c d e Baele, Stephane J.; Brace, Lewys; Coan, Travis G. (2021). "Variations on a Theme? Comparing 4chan, 8kun, and Other chans' Far-Right '/pol' Boards". Perspectives on Terrorism. 15 (1): 65–80. ISSN 2334-3745. JSTOR 26984798.
  4. ^ a b c Elley, Ben (March 2021). ""The rebirth of the West begins with you!"—Self-improvement as radicalisation on 4chan". Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. Springer Nature. 8 (1): 67. doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00732-x. ISSN 2662-9992.
  5. ^ a b Hagen, Sal; Jokubauskaitė, Emilija (18 January 2021). Dutch junk news on Reddit and 4chan/pol. The Politics of Social Media Manipulation. Amsterdam University Press. pp. 174, 180, 188, 202–203, 207. doi:10.1515/9789048551675-007. ISBN 978-90-485-5167-5.
  6. ^ a b c d e f Corsi, Giulio (9 July 2021). "Climate change communication on 4chan's /pol/ board 2015-2019: An automated content analysis". First Monday. 26 (8). doi:10.5210/fm.v26i8.11082. ISSN 1396-0466.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h Colley, Thomas; Moore, Martin (1 January 2022). "The challenges of studying 4chan and the Alt-Right: 'Come on in the water's fine'". New Media & Society. 24 (1): 5–30. doi:10.1177/1461444820948803. ISSN 1461-4448.
  8. ^ a b c d e Hine, Gabriel Emile; Onaolapo, Jeremiah; De Cristofaro, Emiliano; Kourtellis, Nicolas; Leontiadis, Ilias; Samaras, Riginos; Stringhini, Gianluca; Blackburn, Jeremy (May 2017). Kek, Cucks, and God Emperor Trump: A Measurement Study of 4chan's Politically Incorrect Forum and Its Effects on the Web. International Conference on Web and Social Media. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
  9. ^ a b c d e Siegel, Jacob (29 June 2015). "Dylann Roof, 4chan, and the New Online Racism". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 17 July 2015.
  10. ^ a b Cristofaro, Emiliano De (8 November 2016). "4chan raids: how one dark corner of the internet is spreading its shadows". The Conversation. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
  11. ^ a b c Tahmasbi, Fatemeh; Schild, Leonard; Ling, Chen; Blackburn, Jeremy; Stringhini, Gianluca; Zhang, Yang; Zannettou, Savvas (19 April 2021). ""Go eat a bat, Chang!": On the Emergence of Sinophobic Behavior on Web Communities in the Face of COVID-19". Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. WWW '21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery: 1122–1133. doi:10.1145/3442381.3450024. ISBN 978-1-4503-8312-7.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g Thorleifsson, Cathrine (18 November 2021). Research Council of Norway. "From cyberfascism to terrorism: On 4chan/pol/ culture and the transnational production of memetic violence". Nations and Nationalism. Wiley-Blackwell. 28 (1): 286–301. doi:10.1111/nana.12780. ISSN 1354-5078.
  13. ^ a b c d e Zelenkauskaite, Asta; Toivanen, Pihla; Huhtamäki, Jukka; Valaskivi, Katja (4 January 2021). "Shades of hatred online: 4chan duplicate circulation surge during hybrid media events". First Monday. 26 (1). doi:10.5210/fm.v26i1.11075. ISSN 1396-0466.
  14. ^ a b Frosch, Dan; McWhirter, Cameron; Vielkind, Jimmy; Wells, Georgia (17 May 2022). "Buffalo Shooter's 673-Page Diary Reveals Descent Into Racist Extremism". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on 17 May 2022. Retrieved 18 May 2022. He credited 4chan, where extremist views are expressed with few restrictions, with influencing him. In particular, he spent time on the platform's "politically incorrect" page that is known among analysts as a hub for spreading far-right ideology, including white supremacy.
  15. ^ Krafft, P. M.; Donovan, Joan (3 March 2020). "Disinformation by Design: The Use of Evidence Collages and Platform Filtering in a Media Manipulation Campaign". Political Communication. 37 (2): 194–214. doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1686094. ISSN 1058-4609.
  16. ^ a b c Beyer, Jessica L. (10 November 2021), Rohlinger, Deana A.; Sobieraj, Sarah (eds.), "Trolls and Hacktivists: Political Mobilization from Online Communities", The Oxford Handbook of Digital Media Sociology, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197510636.013.47, ISBN 978-0-19-751063-6, retrieved 22 May 2022
  17. ^ a b Milton, Josh (8 March 2021). "Super straight: Transphobic trend has links to the far-right". PinkNews. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  18. ^ The board has been noted for widespread[6] content that is:
  19. ^ Burton, Anthony G.; Koehorst, Dimitri (25 September 2020). "Research note: The spread of political misinformation on online subcultural platforms". Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/mr-2020-40.
  20. ^ Ludemann, Dillon (2 August 2021). "Digital semaphore: Political discourse and identity negotiation through 4chan's /pol/". New Media & Society: 146144482110348. doi:10.1177/14614448211034848. ISSN 1461-4448. S2CID 238796625.
  21. ^ a b Wall, Travis; Mitew, Teodor (30 April 2018). "Swarm networks and the design process of a distributed meme warfare campaign". First Monday. 23 (5). doi:10.5210/fm.v22i5.8290. ISSN 1396-0466.
  22. ^ Fathallah, Judith May (19 May 2021). "'Getting by' on 4chan: Feminine self-presentation and capital-claiming in antifeminist Web space". First Monday. 26 (6). doi:10.5210/fm.v26i7.10449. ISSN 1396-0466. ...'/pol/' ... is slightly less anonymous than most of 4chan as a) identities are more likely to be stable throughout threads (but not between threads)...
  23. ^ Ludemann, Dillon (1 August 2018). "/pol/emics: Ambiguity, scales, and digital discourse on 4chan". Discourse, Context & Media. Elsevier. 24: 92–98. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2018.01.010. ISSN 2211-6958. S2CID 148708994.
  24. ^ Hathaway, Jay (7 June 2017). "What the Harvard teens don't get about memes". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on 15 August 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  25. ^ Tait, Amelia (16 February 2017). "First they came for Pepe: How "ironic" Nazism is taking over the internet". New Statesman. Retrieved 16 August 2019.
  26. ^ Wilson, Jason (23 May 2017). "Hiding in plain sight: how the 'alt-right' is weaponizing irony to spread fascism". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  27. ^ McKay, Tom (13 July 2016). "Inside 8chan's /pol/, the Far-Right Forum Where Trump's Star of David Meme First Spread". Mic. Retrieved 20 May 2022. /pol/ is a 4chan board too... On a place like /pol/, there's no clear delineation between sincerity, irony and cynicism.
  28. ^ Hagen, Sal (2022). "'Who is /ourguy/?': Tracing panoramic memes to study the collectivity of 4chan/pol/". New Media & Society: 146144482210782. doi:10.1177/14614448221078274. ISSN 1461-4448. S2CID 246726080.
  29. ^ a b c "4chan/History". Bibliotheca Anonoma. Retrieved 28 January 2021.
  30. ^ Beran, Dale (30 July 2019). It Came from Something Awful: How a Toxic Troll Army Accidentally Memed Donald Trump into Office. St. Martin's Publishing Group. ISBN 9781250219473
  31. ^ Poole, Christopher "moot" (19 January 2011). "Why were /r9k/ and /new/ removed?". 4chan. Archived from the original on 20 August 2011. Retrieved 16 August 2019 – via WebCite.
  32. ^ a b c d e Massanari, Adrienne; Golumbia, David, eds. (1 July 2019). Dennis Erasmus (pseudonym). "Containment Breach: 4chan's /pol/ and the Failed Logic of "Safe Spaces" for Far-Right Ideology". Boundary 2. 4 (1).
  33. ^ "Stormfront". Hate on Display Hate Symbols Database. Retrieved 18 July 2020.
  34. ^ Warf, Barney, ed. (15 May 2018). The SAGE Encyclopedia of the Internet. SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-5264-5043-2.
  35. ^ Poole, Christopher "moot" (23 October 2011). "Welcome back, robots". 4chan /r9k/.[dead link]
  36. ^ Lagorio-Chafkin, Christine (2018). "r/The_Donald". We Are the Nerds: The Birth and Tumultuous Life of Reddit, the Internet's Culture Laboratory. Hachette Books. p. 323. ISBN 978-0-316-43536-9.
  37. ^ Bankoff, Caroline (29 March 2012). "White Supremacist Claims to Have Hacked Trayvon Martin's Email, Social Media Accounts". The New Yorker. Retrieved 17 July 2015.
  38. ^ Mackey, Robert (29 March 2012). "Bloggers Cherry-Pick From Social Media to Cast Trayvon Martin as a Menace". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 July 2015.
  39. ^ Daro, Ishmael N. (3 June 2016). "Don't Believe Any Breaking News That Names This Comedian As A Mass Shooter". BuzzFeed. Archived from the original on 3 June 2016. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  40. ^ Bell, Chris (2 October 2017). "Las Vegas: The fake photos shared after tragedies". BBC News. Retrieved 16 August 2019.
  41. ^ Shieber, Jonathan (2 October 2017). "How reports from 4chan on the Las Vegas shooting showed up on Google Top Stories". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 October 2017. Retrieved 6 November 2017.
  42. ^ Machkovech, Sam (2 October 2017). "Google admits citing 4chan to spread fake Vegas shooter news". Ars Technica. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
  43. ^ a b Ferréol, Théodore B. (14 April 2016). "Hat 4Chan die russische Armee dazu gebracht, syrische Rebellen zu bombardieren?" [Did 4Chan get the Russian army to bomb Syrian rebels?]. Motherboard (in German). Retrieved 20 November 2021.
  44. ^ Zoltany, Monika (11 March 2017). "Shia LaBeouf Flag Capture Is Nothing -- 4Chan Once Called In An Airstrike". Inquisitr. Retrieved 20 November 2021.
  45. ^ Steinblatt, Jacob (6 June 2016). "How One 4Chan Board Is Trying To Fight ISIS In Syria". Vocativ. Retrieved 20 November 2021.
  46. ^ a b Tait, Amelia (23 September 2016). ""Stinking Googles should be killed": why 4chan is using a search engine as a racist slur". The New Statesman. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
  47. ^ Griffin, Andrew (3 October 2016). "Far-right Twitter and Facebook users make secret code to avoid censorship". The Independent. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
  48. ^ "Pepe the Frog". Anti-Defamation League. Archived from the original on 14 March 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  49. ^ Roy, Jessica (11 October 2016). "How 'Pepe the Frog' went from harmless to hate symbol". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  50. ^ Ellyatt, Holly (29 September 2016). "Who is Pepe the Frog and why has he become a hate symbol?". CNBC. Archived from the original on 30 September 2016. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  51. ^ Rieger, Diana; Kümpel, Anna Sophie; Wich, Maximilian; Kiening, Toni; Groh, Georg (20 October 2021). "Assessing the Extent and Types of Hate Speech in Fringe Communities: A Case Study of Alt-Right Communities on 8chan, 4chan, and Reddit". Social Media + Society. Taylor & Francis. 7 (4): 1–13. doi:10.1177/20563051211052906 (inactive 27 May 2022).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of May 2022 (link)
  52. ^ Lee, Oliver (13 March 2016). "Understanding Trump's Troll Army". Motherboard. Vice Media. Archived from the original on 6 July 2017. Retrieved 14 July 2017.
  53. ^ Ohlheiser, Abby (9 November 2016). "'We actually elected a meme as president': How 4chan celebrated Trump's victory". The Washington Post. Retrieved 14 July 2017.
  54. ^ Steinblatt, Jacob (13 October 2015). "Donald Trump Embraces His 4Chan Fans". Vocativ. Archived from the original on 7 April 2016. Retrieved 14 July 2017.
  55. ^ Schreckinger, Ben (March–April 2017). "World War Meme". Politico. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 14 July 2017.
  56. ^ Selk, Avi (2 April 2017). "A live stream of Shia LaBeouf chanting was disrupted by Nazi-themed dancing. Then things got weird". The Washington Post. Retrieved 10 November 2017.
  57. ^ Ross, Janell (3 November 2017). "'It's okay to be white' signs and stickers appear on campuses and streets across the country". The Washington Post. Retrieved 5 November 2017.
  58. ^ Brooks, Marcus A. (1 November 2020). "It's okay to be White: laundering White supremacy through a colorblind victimized White race-consciousness raising campaign". Sociological Spectrum. 40 (6): 400–416. doi:10.1080/02732173.2020.1812456. ISSN 0273-2173. S2CID 225216067.
  59. ^ Brodeur, Michael Andor (20 September 2018). "That hand symbol you're seeing everywhere? Not OK". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 30 September 2018.
  60. ^ Zeeuw, Daniel de; Hagen, Sal; Peeters, Stijn; Jokubauskaite, Emilija (26 October 2020). "Tracing normiefication: A cross-platform analysis of the QAnon conspiracy theory". First Monday. 25 (11). doi:10.5210/fm.v25i11.10643. ISSN 1396-0466.
  61. ^ Brodkin, Jon (20 March 2019). "4chan, 8chan blocked by Australian and NZ ISPs for hosting shooting video". Ars Technica. Retrieved 24 May 2022.
  62. ^ "Government Orders 8 Sites Blocked For Hosting Christchurch Footage". Kotaku Australia. 9 September 2019. Archived from the original on 10 September 2019. Retrieved 11 July 2020.
  63. ^ a b Evans, Robert (28 April 2019). "Ignore The Poway Synagogue Shooter's Manifesto: Pay Attention To 8chan's /pol/ Board". Bellingcat. Archived from the original on 28 April 2019. Retrieved 10 April 2021.
  64. ^ a b c Malevich, Simon; Robertson, Tom (24 February 2020). "Violence begetting violence: An examination of extremist content on deep Web social networks". First Monday. 25 (3). doi:10.5210/fm.v25i3.10421. ISSN 1396-0466.
  65. ^ Soesanto, Stefan (2021). "The Dr. House Approach to Information Warfare" (PDF). The Cyber Defense Review. West Point, New York: Army Cyber Institute at the United States Military Academy. 6 (1): 119–130. ISSN 2474-2120. JSTOR e26994108.
  66. ^ Friedersdorf, Connor (7 April 2021). "The sexual identity that emerged on TikTok". The Atlantic.
  67. ^ a b c Ibrahim, Nur (March 2021). "Did the 'Super Straight' Trend Originate With Nazis on 4chan?". Snopes. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  68. ^ Asarch, Steven (8 March 2021). "A social-media trend has people identifying as 'super straight.' The transphobic campaign was meant to divide LGBTQ people". Insider. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  69. ^ a b Ball, Siobhan (9 March 2021). "Transphobic trolls are trying to pass off 'super straight' as a new sexual identity". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on 9 March 2021. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  70. ^ Closson, Troy; Medina, Eduardo; Patel, Vimal (14 May 2022). "Live Updates: Gunman Kills 10 at Buffalo Supermarket in Racially Motivated Attack". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 15 May 2022. Retrieved 14 May 2022. Around May 2020, during a period of pandemic boredom, Mr. Gendron said that he had begun to frequent 4chan, an anonymous forum, including its Politically Incorrect message board. There, he said, he was exposed to the conspiracy theory that white people are at risk of being replaced.
  71. ^ Niemietz, Brian (25 May 2022). "Rep. Paul Gosar blames Texas school massacre on 'transsexual leftist illegal alien'". New York Daily News. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  72. ^ Yurcaba, Jo; Goggin, Ben; Collins, Ben (25 May 2022). "Trans woman's photo used to spread baseless online theory about Texas shooter". NBC News. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  73. ^ Stein, Joshua (27 May 2022). "How the Right-Wing Smear That the Texas Shooter Was a Trans Woman Spread So Fast". Slate. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  74. ^ Dewey, Caitlin (25 September 2014). "Absolutely everything you need to know to understand 4chan, the Internet's own bogeyman". The Washington Post. Retrieved 17 July 2015.
  75. ^ Alonso, Fernando III (13 June 2014). "#EndFathersDay is the work of 4chan, not feminists". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on 5 July 2014. Retrieved 17 July 2015.
  76. ^ Schwartz, Or (7 December 2014). "4chan Trolls Take Over Electronic Billboard, Racism Ensues". Vocativ. Archived from the original on 1 February 2015. Retrieved 17 July 2015.
  77. ^ "Alt-Right". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved 30 October 2017.
  78. ^ "The Happy Merchant". Anti-Defamation League. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
  79. ^ a b c Khazan, Olga (25 January 2021). "The Far Right's fear of 'Glowies'". The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2021.
  80. ^ Potapova, Rodmonga (1 October 2015). Determination of the Internet Anonymity Influence on the Level of Aggression and Usage of Obscene Lexis (PhD). Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. arXiv:1510.00240. Retrieved 21 March 2021.
  81. ^ Cushing, Tim (7 August 2015). "Man Leaks Sensitive Documents To 4chan; Receives Insults, Arrest For His Troubles". Techdirt. Archived from the original on 15 September 2015. Retrieved 11 July 2020.
  82. ^ "Richmond Gun Rally: Is A Virginia Cop Giving 4Chan's /pol Board Inside Info?". Bellingcat. 19 January 2020. Archived from the original on 19 January 2020. Retrieved 11 July 2020.
  83. ^ "They glow in the dark". YouTube. 13 March 2017. Archived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 11 July 2020.
  84. ^ Arthur, Rob (2 November 2020). "The Man Who Helped Turn 4chan Into the Internet's Racist Engine". Motherboard. Vice Media. Archived from the original on 18 November 2020. Retrieved 28 November 2020.
  85. ^ Zannettou, Savvas; Caulfield, Tristan; De Cristofaro, Emiliano; Kourtelris, Nicolas; Leontiadis, Ilias; Sirivianos, Michael; Stringhini, Gianluca; Blackburn, Jeremy (2017). "The Web Centipede: Understanding How Web Communities Influence Each Other Through the Lens of Mainstream and Alternative News Sources" (PDF). Proceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference. ACM. pp. 405–417. ISBN 978-1-4503-5118-8.
  86. ^ Cressey, Daniel (9 June 2017). Gianluca Stringhini. "Shining a light on the dark corners of the web". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2017.22128. ISSN 1476-4687.
  87. ^ Jasper, Marykate (23 June 2017). "So That's Where All the Horrible YouTube Comments Come From". The Mary Sue. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
  88. ^ Rimer, Sara (22 March 2021). "BU Researchers Warned of Online Surge of Anti-Asian Attacks a Year Ago". Boston University. Retrieved 15 July 2021.
  89. ^ Zonshine, Idan. "New UK report exposes massive online network of far-right antisemitism". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 25 August 2020.

Further reading[edit]

source: https://web.archive.org/web/20220706152212/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//pol/

Leave a Reply