Cannabis Ruderalis

New page reviewer


I recently received an invitation to apply for this set of permissions, and I am happy to oblige. I have been editing extensively for the past few years, and in that time I have created many articles and handled feedback on them. I also have a fair amount experience with the AFD and CSD systems. I would be happy to help improve this project even further with the new page reviewer permissions. Isi96 (talk) 03:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the long delay in processing your request, @Isi96:. I'm afraid I'm going to mark it as  Not done at this time. I can see that you have a lot of experience in mainspace editing, which is great, but are still quite new to maintenance tasks. I can only see participation in five AfDs and I can't find any recent CSD nominations (please consider using Wikipedia:Twinkle to keep a CSD log). For NPP we usually look for quite a bit more experience than that. You might give WP:AFC a try first – the work is similar but it has a lower barrier for entry. – Joe (talk) 08:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Given that the February Articles Needing References Drive has wrapped up and that I'm a sucker for drives, I'd be delighted to participate. I've been meaning to regularize my editing anyway, and it plays to my strengths! kencf0618 (talk) 12:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Thank you for volunteering and sorry for the long wait. NPP doesn't currently have a backlog drive planned (the last was in January), but there's always plenty of work to do! – Joe (talk) 08:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I was invited by a message to become a new page reviewer because my account fits the criteria. I would like to help Rahammz (talk) 13:39, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I oppose to grant this specific and advanced perm in unexperienced editor who do not demonstrate the deletion policy and they 1 times only participate in WP:AFD and not participate in WP:AFC; I don't think this user is eligible for this perm without any enough experience in this field. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Aviram7, but the information you specified is typically something that an admin would come across in their review of the user prior to granting them the permission. Generally, non-admins are discouraged from commenting unless there's something one wishes to share that they would not expect the reviewing admin to notice. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While ideally we would indeed like to see some prior experience in deletion or AfC, your substantial article writing experience also speaks to a good knowledge of policies relating to new articles.  Done for a one-month trial; please make a new request shortly before it expires, to make it permanent. – Joe (talk) 09:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Applying to be reinstated, as I didn't reapply back when the trial period ended due to an unforeseen wikibreak. DrowssapSMM 00:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DrowssapSMM: I've reviewed your logs and it looks like you did an excellent job during the drive. Thanks very much for volunteering again.  Done. – Joe (talk) 08:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I have made a good amount of edits on Wikipedia, and I believe that I am ready to be a reviewer. I have had some issues in the past with understanding notability, but I have learned from my past mistakes and analyzed the notability guidelines. I know I can now accurately review articles to the best of my ability. Thank you. Antny08 (talk) 17:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. NPP requires more experience than AfC, and nothing has really changed since the recent AfC decline except another of your articles being sent to AfD, where you're making arguments like "He has not thousands, but MILLIONS of followers", "if it gets deleted I will probably leave Wikipedia", and "if the article gets deleted then it will double my deleted edits count, which will strongly hurt my chances of getting administrator someday". I do not think you have the experience or maturity for additional permissions at this time. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It’s just me expressing my opinions, that does not really show not having experience or being immature, but, okay, if you say so, I accept the decline. Antny08 (talk) 13:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I like helping the project in areas that need more assistance than others. Thank you. Fdssdf (talk) 03:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC) Fdssdf (talk) 03:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for offering to help, Fdssdf, and sorry for the delay in handling this request. I can see that you are a very experienced editor, but for NPP we usually look for specific prior experience at AfD, AfC, and/or with article creation. And it doesn't look like you've been much involved in those areas. You might want to first try WP:AFC to get a feel for new article work, after which do feel free to make a new request. But  Not done for now, sorry. – Joe (talk) 08:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:I'm tla

It has been a while since my last request, and I believe I have demonstrated that I am ready and I hope whoever reviews this to share my thoughts. Since my last request, I have made 43 pages and am also an active AfC reviewer. The backlog is at 13K+ and I would be happy to contribute in taking that down. TLAtlak 11:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1][2]). MusikBot talk 11:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing my request. TLAtlak 14:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Marking  Request withdrawn for the bot. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I have been tagging and flagging new pages for a long time, but with a lot of infrequency. However, since I'm unable to mark a page as patrolled, I'm not able to help reduce the workload on the rest of the editors here. With this permission, whenever I'm looking into new pages, I'll be able to make more of a difference. Shashwat986talk 07:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has 372 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 07:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My edits are lower than the threshold of 500, but that is due to my work on New Pages. As a result of my work, I have over 1200 edits in User_talk pages (implying around 800 pages successfully deleted). If the 500 is still a hard-cutoff, I withdraw my request. Shashwat986talk 09:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Shashwat986: It's flexiblish, but explicitly doesn't include deleted edits – we're looking for people with experience improving articles as well as deleting them. I can see that you were quite active in new page and CSD patrolling in 2010–13, but since then you've been almost completely inactive. Welcome back! The CSD are basically the same as they were then, but the kind of new pages we see has changed quite a lot, as have community expectations on sourcing, notability, etc.
Based on your prior experience, I'd be willing to grant you the right despite not meeting the formal criteria (with the usual one-month trial period), but could you please first confirm that you've familiarised yourself with the current guidelines at WP:NPP? – Joe (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, though I have to say Moneyview gives me pause. Could you explain what prompted you to write that article and where you found the sources? – Joe (talk) 09:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I have been editing for more than a year and have more than 500 mainspace edits, I have made various articles. I would like to help out in reviewing new articles. TheTankman (talk) 13:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for volunteering TheTankman. I can see that you've written a fair few articles, but we usually also look for some experience in assessing others' articles either through the deletion process (WP:CSD or WP:AfD) or WP:AfC. I'm not seeing that in your case, so I'm afraid it's  Not done for now. But please do consider getting involved in some of those areas and then reapplying. – Joe (talk) 09:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


recently returned to activity. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 16:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, welcome back. – Joe (talk) 09:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


With over 3 years and 6700+ edits I demonstrate the relevant areas that I am of a sufficient level of knowledge with the policies regarding page creation, deletion, citations and use of secondary reliable sources etc. Also Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I have a solid history that shows I am proficient with communicating and interacting with new users in a good, positive, civil, and appropriate manner. WikiHuman2021 (talk) 01:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for volunteering WikiHuman2021. I can see that you're an experienced editor, but it doesn't look like you've been involved in any of the maintenance areas we would usually look for to demonstrate familiarity with the policies and processes involved in new article work (WP:AFD, WP:AFC, article writing, etc.). I would recommend starting with one of those, to get a feel for it, then making a new request down the line, if you're still interested. But in terms of NPR,  Not done for now, sorry. – Joe (talk) 09:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'd like to help with the backlog and gain more experience. Robertjamal12 ~🔔 15:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertjamal12: Thank you for offering to help. I can see that you're an experienced editor, but I'm a bit concerned with how many of your own articles have been deleted, and also that your AfD record consists entirely of "keep" votes – mostly for articles that ended up getting deleted. On the basis I'm afraid I'll have to say  Not done for now. If you would like to try getting involved in WP:AFC and maybe spend more time at AfD to get a better feel for our inclusion guidelines, I would be happy to reconsider your request down the line. – Joe (talk) 09:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I am working on WP:DRAFT and WP:ACR specially sport categories. known WP:HTCAP, WP:YFA and WP:N as well. Spiderjiu💬 13:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has 156 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 13:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for offering to help out Spiderjiu, but your account does not meet the minimum criteria for this user right (see the bot's comment above) and you do you appear to have much experience in the areas we typically look for in new page patrollers (AfC, AfD, and article creation). I would suggest getting involved in those areas and, if you're still interested, requesting again in a few months. But  Not done for now. – Joe (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now blocked for sockpuppetry. Liz Read! Talk! 19:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I have participated in policy-compliant content creation and AfD for years and was recently invited to join the NPP. While monitoring WikiProject-specific article alerts and new articles feeds, I sometimes see promising drafts or new pages about subjects I'm interested in sit for months, and I'd like to support these types of articles by cautiously improving and reviewing / approving or rejecting them when appropriate. Habst (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, glad to have you on board. – Joe (talk) 09:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I was denied earlier two times. I am told that I need Admin's interfere, which has no logic as I have participated well in AFC, AFD, and rest, now I am willing reduce the new page backlog. I have witnessed a massive backlog of WP:NPP. I know how to handle Page Triage and other issues like COI and CPE, Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). MusikBot talk 16:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. You have been denied this right four times and that last time was three weeks ago. Hey man im josh asked you to participate in more AfDs before you applied again; you've participated in three. Please do not make another request here until at least six months has passed and you have meaningfully acted on the feedback you have received in previous requests. – Joe (talk) 17:38, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply