Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Luxembourg, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Communes of Luxembourg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bous. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited List of the first openly LGBT holders of political offices, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nancy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you please explain what you are doing to articles re Luxembourgers/Luxembourgian/Luxembourgish? Thanks. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for making so many of them in a short span without consultation, perhaps I got overzealous. "Luxembourgian" seems to be a very rare form, and as a lifelong Luxembourger I've never heard it used orally. Look around on official websites like gouvernement.lu or luxembourg.public.lu and you find virtually no instance of it. lod.lu, the main online source for Luxembourgish words and their translations, cannot find it. "Luxembourgish" is a much more widely used variant that is consistant with e.g French "Luxembourgeois" (note how "Luxembourgien", which would logically be the cognate of "Luxembourgian", is entirely inexistent) and German "Luxemburgisch", while "Luxembourgian", and this is just my personal assumption, seems to be used by non-Luxembourgish contributors who, due to Luxembourg's relative obscurity, are unsure of its demonym. I would go as far as saying it is an incorrect form. Procrastineur49 (talk) 16:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]