Cannabinoid receptor type 1
|, CANN6, CB-R, CB1, CB1A, CB1K5, CB1R, CNR, cannabinoid receptor 1 (brain), cannabinoid receptor 1, cannabinoid CB1 receptor gene|
Cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1), also known as cannabinoid receptor 1, is a G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptor that in humans is encoded by the CNR1 gene. The human CB1 receptor is expressed in the peripheral nervous system and central nervous system. It is activated by: endocannabinoids, a group of retrograde neurotransmitters that include anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG); plant phytocannabinoids, such as the compound THC which is an active ingredient of the psychoactive drug cannabis; and, synthetic analogs of THC. CB1 is antagonized by the phytocannabinoid tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV).
- 1 Structure
- 2 Mechanism
- 3 Expression
- 4 Function
- 5 Use of antagonists
- 6 Ligands
- 7 Binding affinities
- 8 Evolution
- 9 See also
- 10 References
- 11 External links
The CB1 receptor shares the structure characteristic of all G-protein-coupled receptors, possessing seven transmembrane domains connected by three extracellular and three intracellular loops, an extracellular N-terminal tail, and an intracellular C-terminal tail. The receptor may exist as a homodimer or form heterodimers or other GPCR oligomers with different classes of G-protein-coupled receptors. Observed heterodimers include A2A–CB1, CB1–D2, OX1–CB1, while many more may only be stable enough to exist in vivo. The CB1 receptor possesses an allosteric modulatory binding site.
The CB1 receptor is a pre-synaptic heteroreceptor that modulates neurotransmitter release when activated in a dose-dependent, stereoselective and pertussis toxin-sensitive manner. The CB1 receptor is activated by cannabinoids, generated naturally inside the body (endocannabinoids) or introduced into the body as cannabis or a related synthetic compound.
Research suggests that the majority of CB1 receptors are coupled through Gi/o proteins. Upon activation, CB1 receptor exhibits its effects mainly through activation of Gi, which decreases intracellular cAMP concentration by inhibiting its production enzyme, adenylate cyclase, and increases mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP kinase) concentration. Alternatively, in some rare cases CB1 receptor activation may be coupled to Gs proteins, which stimulate adenylate cyclase. cAMP is known to serve as a second messenger coupled to a variety of ion channels, including the positively influenced inwardly rectifying potassium channels (=Kir or IRK), and calcium channels, which are activated by cAMP-dependent interaction with such molecules as protein kinase A (PKA), protein kinase C (PKC), Raf-1, ERK, JNK, p38, c-fos, c-jun, and others.
In terms of function, the inhibition of intracellular cAMP expression shortens the duration of pre-synaptic action potentials by prolonging the rectifying potassium A-type currents, which is normally inactivated upon phosphorylation by PKA. This inhibition grows more pronounced when considered with the effect of activated CB1 receptors to limit calcium entry into the cell, which does not occur through cAMP but by a direct G-protein-mediated inhibition. As presynaptic calcium entry is a requirement for vesicle release, this function will decrease the transmitter that enters the synapse upon release. The relative contribution of each of these two inhibitory mechanisms depends on the variance of ion channel expression by cell type.
The CB1 receptor can also be modulated by allosterically synthetic ligands in a positive and negative manner. In vivo exposure to THC impairs long-term potentiation and leads to a reduction of phosphorylated CREB.
In summary, CB1 receptor activity has been found to be coupled to certain ion channels, in the following manner:
- Positively to inwardly rectifying and A-type outward potassium channels.
- Negatively to D-type outward potassium channels
- Negatively to N-type and P/Q-type calcium channels.
The CB1 receptor is encoded by the gene CNR1, located on human chromosome 6. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described for this gene. CNR1 orthologs have been identified in most mammals.
The CB1 receptor is expressed pre-synaptically at both glutaminergic and GABAergic interneurons and, in effect, acts as a neuromodulator to inhibit release of glutamate and GABA. Repeated administration of receptor agonists may result in receptor internalization and/ or a reduction in receptor protein signalling.
CB1 receptors are expressed most densely in the central nervous system and are largely responsible for mediating the effects of cannabinoid binding in the brain. Endocannabinoids released by a depolarized neuron bind to CB1 receptors on pre-synaptic glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons, resulting in a respective decrease in either glutamate or GABA release. Limiting glutamate release causes reduced excitation, while limiting GABA release suppresses inhibition, a common form of short-term plasticity in which the depolarization of a single neuron induces a reduction in GABA-mediated inhibition, in effect exciting the postsynaptic cell.
Varying levels of CB1 expression can be detected in the olfactory bulb, cortical regions (neocortex, pyriform cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala), several parts of basal ganglia, thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei, and other subcortical regions (e.g., the septal region), cerebellar cortex, and brainstem nuclei (e.g., the periaqueductal gray).
CB1 mRNA transcripts are abundant in GABAergic interneurons of the hippocampus, indirectly reflecting the expression of these receptors and elucidating the established effect of cannabinoids on memory. These receptors are densely located in cornu ammonis pyramidal cells, which are known to release glutamate. Cannabinoids suppress the induction of LTP and LTD in the hippocampus by inhibiting these glutamatergic neurons. By reducing the concentration of glutamate released below the threshold necessary to depolarize the postynaptic receptor NMDA, a receptor known to be directly related to the induction of LTP and LTD, cannabinoids are a crucial factor in the selectivity of memory.
These receptors are highly expressed by GABAergic interneurons as well as glutamatergic principal neurons. However, a higher density is found within GABAergic cells. This means that, although synaptic strength/frequency, and thus potential to induce LTP, is lowered, net hippocampal activity is raised. In addition, CB1 receptors in the hippocampus indirectly inhibit the release of acetylcholine. This serves as the modulatory axis opposing GABA, decreasing neurotransmitter release. Cannabinoids also likely play an important role in the development of memory through their neonatal promotion of myelin formation, and thus the individual segregation of axons.
CB1 receptors are expressed throughout the basal ganglia and have well-established effects on movement in rodents. As in the hippocampus, these receptors inhibit the release of glutamate or GABA transmitter, resulting in decreased excitation or reduced inhibition based on the cell they are expressed in. Consistent with the variable expression of both excitatory glutamate and inhibitory GABA interneurons in both the basal ganglia’s direct and indirect motor loops, synthetic cannabinoids are known to influence this system in a dose-dependent triphasic pattern. Decreased locomotor activity is seen at both higher and lower concentrations of applied cannabinoids, whereas an enhancement of movement may occur upon moderate dosages. However, these dose-dependent effects have been studied predominately in rodents, and the physiological basis for this triphasic pattern warrants future research in humans. Effects may vary based on the site of cannabinoid application, input from higher cortical centers, and whether drug application is unilateral or bilateral.
Cerebellum and neocortex
The role of the CB1 receptor in the regulation of motor movements is complicated by the additional expression of this receptor in the cerebellum and neocortex, two regions associated with the coordination and initiation of movement. Research suggests that anandamide is synthesized by Purkinje cells and acts on presynaptic receptors to inhibit glutamate release from granule cells or GABA release from the terminals of basket cells. In the neocortex, these receptors are concentrated on local interneurons in cerebral layers II-III and V-VI. Compared to rat brains, humans express more CB1 receptors in the cerebral cortex and amygdala and less in the cerebellum, which may help explain why motor function seems to be more compromised in rats than humans upon cannabinoid application.
Many of the documented analgesic effects of cannabinoids are based on the interaction of these compounds with CB1 receptors on spinal cord interneurons in the superficial levels of the dorsal horn, known for its role in nociceptive processing. In particular, the CB1 is heavily expressed in layers 1 and 2 of the spinal cord dorsal horn and in lamina 10 by the central canal. Dorsal root ganglion also express these receptors, which target a variety of peripheral terminals involved in nociception. Signals on this track are also transmitted to the periaqueductal gray (PAG) of the midbrain. Endogenous cannabinoids are believed to exhibit an analgesic effect on these receptors by limiting both GABA and glutamate of PAG cells that relate to nociceptive input processing, a hypothesis consistent with the finding that anandamide release in the PAG is increased in response to pain-triggering stimuli.
CB1 is expressed on several types of cell in pituitary gland, thyroid gland, and possibly in the adrenal gland. CB1 is also expressed in several cells relating to metabolism, such as fat cells, muscle cells, liver cells (and also in the endothelial cells, Kupffer cells and stellate cells of the liver), and in the digestive tract. It is also expressed in the lungs and the kidney.
CB1 is present on Leydig cells and human sperms. In females, it is present in the ovaries, oviducts myometrium, decidua, and placenta. It has also been implicated in the proper development of the embryo.
Health and disease
Several studies have implicated the CB1 receptor in the maintenance of homeostasis in health and disease. In a rodent neuropathic pain model, increased expression of these receptors was seen in thalamic neurons, the spinal cord, and dorsal root ganglion. Increased receptor expression has also been found in human hepatocellular carcinoma tumor samples and other human prostate cancer cells. The expression of these receptors is believed to modulate neurotransmitter release in a manner that prevents the development of excessive neuronal activity, reducing pain and other inflammatory symptoms. This finding is consistent with the localization of CB1 receptors to the terminals of central and peripheral neurons, and the established mediation of both excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters acetylcholine, noradrenaline, dopamine, 5-HT, GABA, glutamate, D-aspartate, and cholecystokinin. Through its primary action as a Gi coupled receptor, CB1 inhibits production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), metabotropically inhibiting all NT release.
Enhanced receptor expression following disease has been found to result in a leftward shift in the log dose-response curve of cannabinol, and also an increase in the size of its maximal effects.
Anxiety response to novelty
A CB1 receptor knock-out mouse study examined the effect that these receptors play on exploratory behavior in novel situations. Researchers selectively targeted glutamatergic and GABAergic cortical interneurons and studied results in open field, novel object, and sociability tests. Eliminating glutamatergic cannabinoid receptors led to decreased object exploration, social interactions, and increased aggressive behavior. In contrast, GABAergic cannabinoid receptor-knockout mice showed increased exploration of objects, socialization, and open field movement. These opposing effects reveal the importance of the endocannabinoid system in regulating anxiety-dependent behavior. Glutamatergic CB1receptors not only are responsible for mediating aggression but produce anxiolytic-like function by inhibiting excessive arousal, which prevented the mice from exploring both animate and inanimate objects. In contrast, GABAergic CB1 receptors appear to control an anxiogenic-like function by limiting inhibitory transmitter release. Taken together, these results illustrate the regulatory function of the CB1 receptor on the organism’s overall sense of arousal during novel situations and suggest that investigatory drive is associated with impulsive behavior.
Another study found that differential synthesis of anandamide and 2-AG in response to stress mediated beneficial effects of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. These effects were eliminated by the application of the CB1 antagonist AM251, illustrating that this receptor is essential for modulating the function of the stress response.
Inhibition of gastrointestinal activity has been observed after administration of THC or anandamide. This effect is assumed to be CB1-mediated, since this receptor is expressed by the peptide hormone cholecystokinin, and application of the CB1-specific inverse agonist SR 141716A (Rimonabant) blocks the effect. Another report, however, suggests that inhibition of intestinal motility may also have a CB2-mediated component.
The CB1 receptor inverse agonist rimonabant has been found to reduce intake of food or sweet solutions in both humans and mice. Targeting this receptor with rimonabant has been found to prevent the THC-induced enhancement of DA release in the nucleus accumbens shell from food, suggesting that these receptors may be involved in determining the hedonic value of food. In addition, CB1 facilitates ghrelin release, normally happening when the stomach is constricted In the presence of a relatively active system, overeating is promoted. This is the genesis of its appetite-stimulating effects, colloquially called “the munchies.”
Cannabinoids are well known for their cardiovascular activity. Activation of peripheral CB1 receptors contributes to hemorrhagic and endotoxin-induced hypotension. Anandamide and 2-AG, produced by macrophages and platelets, respectively, may mediate this effect. A likely candidate for this function is the heterodimer of CB1 and adenosine 2a. Through an opposing mechanism of action (A2A elevates cAMP), together, they may serve to regulate cardiac blood supply, and thus output.
CB1 induction of LTD and STD have been shown in the dorsal striatum, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, ventral tegmental area, and the stria terminalis (BNST). A recent study compared the endocannabinoid induction of LTD and STD in the bed nucleus of the BNST and striatum. Results found that both short- and long-term effects were dependent on CB1 receptor activation in the striatum, whereas LTD induction in the BNST relied on TRPV1 receptor. Effects vary based on the endocannabinoid molecule: 2-AG was found to act on presynaptic CB1 receptors to mediate retrograde short-term depression following activation of L-type calcium currents, whereas anandamide was synthesized after mGluR5 activation and triggered autocrine signalling that induced long-term depression. These findings demonstrate the CB1 receptor as a direct mechanism for the brain to selectively inhibit neuronal excitability over variable time scales. By selectively internalizing different receptors, the brain may limit the production of specific endocannabinoids to favor a time scale in accordance with its needs. mGlu5 forms a heterodimer with A2A, which allows endocannabinoids to regulate their own levels, as they inhibit cAMP production, thus increase free adenosine to agonise A2A. This forms a feedback loop between the positive and negative metabotropic receptors, which can maintain a relatively similar homeostasis with any neuron connected through an electrical synapse.
CB1 receptors are expressed throughout motor regions of the mammalian brain, suggesting that CB1 has a role in motor control. CB1 activation has been shown to effect specific kinematic variables in rodents, such as the rate of applied force during lever pressing, and the amplitude (but not timing) of whisker movements.
Drug and behavioral addictions
Several recent reviews on CB1 receptors and addiction have indicated that CB1 receptor activation reinstates drug seeking behavior in addicts.
In humans, this results from the influence that limbic CB1 receptors have on mesolimbic dopamine neurons, specifically dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens. As a consequence, CB1 receptor antagonists can reduce drug seeking behavior in some addicts.
The CB1 receptor is expressed by a number of neurons that project from the anterior olfactory nucleus to the ipsilateral main olfactory bulb. However, the effects of cannabinoids on synaptic activity in these neurons has not been well-studied and its effects on olfaction warrant further research in rodents. Cannabinoids are not known to have effects on olfaction in humans. However, as with the rest of the brain, it plays a crucial role in modulation of NT release.
Use of antagonists
Selective CB1 agonists may be used to isolate the effects of the receptor from the CB2 receptor, as most cannabinoids and endocannabinoids bind to both receptor types.
CB1 selective antagonists are used for weight reduction and smoking cessation (see Rimonabant). A substantial number of antagonists of the CB1 receptor have been discovered and characterized. TM38837 has been developed as a CB1 receptor antagonist that is restricted to targeting only peripheral CB1 receptors.
- Virodhamine (Endogenous CB1 antagonist and CB2 agonist)
|CB1 affinity (Ki)||Efficacy towards CB1||CB2 affinity (Ki)||Efficacy towards CB2||Type||References|
|Anandamide||78 nM||Partial agonist||370 nM||Partial agonist||Endogenous|
|N-Arachidonoyl dopamine||250 nM||Agonist||12000 nM||?||Endogenous|||
|2-Arachidonoylglycerol||58.3 nM||Full agonist||145 nM||Full agonist||Endogenous|||
|2-Arachidonyl glyceryl ether||21 nM||Full agonist||480 nM||Full agonist||Endogenous|
|Tetrahydrocannabinol||10 nM||Partial agonist||24 nM||Partial agonist||Phytogenic|||
|EGCG||33.6 μM||Agonist||>50 μM||?||Phytogenic|
|AM-1221||52.3 nM||Agonist||0.28 nM||Agonist||Synthetic|||
|AM-1235||1.5 nM||Agonist||20.4 nM||Agonist||Synthetic|||
|AM-2232||0.28 nM||Agonist||1.48 nM||Agonist||Synthetic|||
|UR-144||150 nM||Full agonist||1.8 nM||Full agonist||Synthetic|||
|JWH-007||9.0 nM||Agonist||2.94 nM||Agonist||Synthetic|||
|JWH-015||383 nM||Agonist||13.8 nM||Agonist||Synthetic|||
|JWH-018||9.00 ± 5.00 nM||Full agonist||2.94 ± 2.65 nM||Full agonist||Synthetic|||
The CNR1 gene is used in animals as a nuclear DNA phylogenetic marker. This intronless gene has first been used to explore the phylogeny of the major groups of mammals, and contributed to reveal that placental orders are distributed into five major clades: Xenarthra, Afrotheria, Laurasiatheria, Euarchonta, and Glires. CNR1 has also proven useful at lower taxonomic levels, such as rodents, and for the identification of dermopterans as the closest primate relatives.
- Discovery and development of Cannabinoid Receptor 1 Antagonists
- Cannabinoid receptor
- Cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2)
- GRCh38: Ensembl release 89: ENSG00000118432 – Ensembl, May 2017
- GRCm38: Ensembl release 89: ENSMUSG00000044288 – Ensembl, May 2017
- “Human PubMed Reference:”.
- “Mouse PubMed Reference:”.
- Abood M, Barth F, Bonner TI, Cabral G, Casellas P, Cravatt BF, Devane WA, Elphick MR, Felder CC, Herkenham M, Howlett AC, Kunos G, Mackie K, Mechoulam R, Pertwee RG (22 August 2018). “CB1 Receptor”. IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. Retrieved 9 November 2018.
- Thomas, Adèle; Stevenson, Lesley A; Wease, Kerrie N; Price, Martin R; Baillie, Gemma; Ross, Ruth A; Pertwee, Roger G (December 2005). “Evidence that the plant cannabinoid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin is a cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonist”. British Journal of Pharmacology. 146 (7): 917–926. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706414. ISSN 0007-1188. PMC 1751228. PMID 16205722.
- Pertwee, R G; Thomas, A; Stevenson, L A; Ross, R A; Varvel, S A; Lichtman, A H; Martin, B R; Razdan, R K (March 2007). “The psychoactive plant cannabinoid, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, is antagonized by Δ8- and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin in mice in vivo”. British Journal of Pharmacology. 150 (5): 586–594. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707124. ISSN 0007-1188. PMC 2189766. PMID 17245367.
- Shao Z, Yin J, Chapman K, Grzemska M, Clark L, Wang J, Rosenbaum DM (2016). “High-resolution crystal structure of the human CB1 cannabinoid receptor”. Nature. 540 (7634): 602–606. Bibcode:2016Natur.540..602S. doi:10.1038/nature20613. PMC 5433929. PMID 27851727.
- Hua T, Vemuri K, Pu M, Qu L, Han GW, Wu Y, Zhao S, Shui W, Li S, Korde A, Laprairie RB, Stahl EL, Ho JH, Zvonok N, Zhou H, Kufareva I, Wu B, Zhao Q, Hanson MA, Bohn LM, Makriyannis A, Stevens RC, Liu ZJ (2016). “Crystal Structure of the Human Cannabinoid Receptor CB1”. Cell. 167 (3): 750–762.e14. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.004. PMC 5322940. PMID 27768894.
- Pertwee RG (April 2006). “The pharmacology of cannabinoid receptors and their ligands: an overview”. International Journal of Obesity. 30 Suppl 1: S13–8. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803272. PMID 16570099.
- Nickols HH, Conn PJ (January 2014). “Development of allosteric modulators of GPCRs for treatment of CNS disorders”. Neurobiology of Disease. 61: 55–71. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2013.09.013. PMC 3875303. PMID 24076101.
- Nguyen T, Li JX, Thomas BF, Wiley JL, Kenakin TP, Zhang Y (November 2016). “Allosteric Modulation: An Alternate Approach Targeting the Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor”. Medicinal Research Reviews. 37 (3): 441–474. doi:10.1002/med.21418. PMID 27879006.
- “Entrez Gene: CNR1 cannabinoid receptor 1 (brain)”.
- Demuth DG, Molleman A (January 2006). “Cannabinoid signalling”. Life Sciences. 78 (6): 549–63. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2005.05.055. PMID 16109430.
- Pagotto U, Marsicano G, Cota D, Lutz B, Pasquali R (February 2006). “The emerging role of the endocannabinoid system in endocrine regulation and energy balance”. Endocrine Reviews. 27 (1): 73–100. doi:10.1210/er.2005-0009. PMID 16306385.
- Elphick MR, Egertová M (March 2001). “The neurobiology and evolution of cannabinoid signalling”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 356 (1407): 381–408. doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0787. PMC 1088434. PMID 11316486.
- Price MR, Baillie GL, Thomas A, Stevenson LA, Easson M, Goodwin R, McLean A, McIntosh L, Goodwin G, Walker G, Westwood P, Marrs J, Thomson F, Cowley P, Christopoulos A, Pertwee RG, Ross RA (November 2005). “Allosteric modulation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor”. Molecular Pharmacology. 68 (5): 1484–95. doi:10.1124/mol.105.016162. PMID 16113085.
- Navarro HA, Howard JL, Pollard GT, Carroll FI (April 2009). “Positive allosteric modulation of the human cannabinoid (CB) receptor by RTI-371, a selective inhibitor of the dopamine transporter”. British Journal of Pharmacology. 156 (7): 1178–84. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00124.x. PMC 2697692. PMID 19226282.
- Horswill JG, Bali U, Shaaban S, Keily JF, Jeevaratnam P, Babbs AJ, Reynet C, Wong Kai In P (November 2007). “PSNCBAM-1, a novel allosteric antagonist at cannabinoid CB1 receptors with hypophagic effects in rats”. British Journal of Pharmacology. 152 (5): 805–14. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707347. PMC 2190018. PMID 17592509.
- Fan N, Yang H, Zhang J, Chen C (February 2010). “Reduced expression of glutamate receptors and phosphorylation of CREB are responsible for in vivo Δ9-THC exposure-impaired hippocampal synaptic plasticity”. Journal of Neurochemistry. 112 (3): 691–702. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06489.x. PMC 2809144. PMID 19912468.
- “OrthoMaM phylogenetic marker: CNR1 coding sequence”.
- Burns HD, Van Laere K, Sanabria-Bohórquez S, Hamill TG, Bormans G, Eng WS, Gibson R, Ryan C, Connolly B, Patel S, Krause S, Vanko A, Van Hecken A, Dupont P, De Lepeleire I, Rothenberg P, Stoch SA, Cote J, Hagmann WK, Jewell JP, Lin LS, Liu P, Goulet MT, Gottesdiener K, Wagner JA, de Hoon J, Mortelmans L, Fong TM, Hargreaves RJ (June 2007). “[18F]MK-9470, a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for in vivo human PET brain imaging of the cannabinoid-1 receptor”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (23): 9800–5. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.9800B. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703472104. PMC 1877985. PMID 17535893.
- Pertwee RG (January 2008). “The diverse CB1 and CB2 receptor pharmacology of three plant cannabinoids: Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin”. British Journal of Pharmacology. 153 (2): 199–215. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707442. PMC 2219532. PMID 17828291.
- Häring M, Kaiser N, Monory K, Lutz B (2011). Burgess HA, ed. “Circuit specific functions of cannabinoid CB1 receptor in the balance of investigatory drive and exploration”. PLOS ONE. 6 (11): e26617. Bibcode:2011PLoSO…626617H. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026617. PMC 3206034. PMID 22069458.
- Hill MN, McLaughlin RJ, Bingham B, Shrestha L, Lee TT, Gray JM, Hillard CJ, Gorzalka BB, Viau V (May 2010). “Endogenous cannabinoid signaling is essential for stress adaptation”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107 (20): 9406–11. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.9406H. doi:10.1073/pnas.0914661107. PMC 2889099. PMID 20439721.
- Mathison R, Ho W, Pittman QJ, Davison JS, Sharkey KA (August 2004). “Effects of cannabinoid receptor-2 activation on accelerated gastrointestinal transit in lipopolysaccharide-treated rats”. British Journal of Pharmacology. 142 (8): 1247–54. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705889. PMC 1575196. PMID 15249429.
- De Luca MA, Solinas M, Bimpisidis Z, Goldberg SR, Di Chiara G (July 2012). “Cannabinoid facilitation of behavioral and biochemical hedonic taste responses”. Neuropharmacology. 63 (1): 161–8. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.10.018. PMC 3705914. PMID 22063718.
- Varga K, Wagner JA, Bridgen DT, Kunos G (August 1998). “Platelet- and macrophage-derived endogenous cannabinoids are involved in endotoxin-induced hypotension”. FASEB Journal. 12 (11): 1035–44. doi:10.1096/fasebj.12.11.1035. PMID 9707176.
- Sidhpura N, Parsons LH (December 2011). “Endocannabinoid-mediated synaptic plasticity and addiction-related behavior”. Neuropharmacology. 61 (7): 1070–87. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.05.034. PMC 3176941. PMID 21669214.
- Puente N, Cui Y, Lassalle O, Lafourcade M, Georges F, Venance L, Grandes P, Manzoni OJ (November 2011). “Polymodal activation of the endocannabinoid system in the extended amygdala”. Nature Neuroscience. 14 (12): 1542–7. doi:10.1038/nn.2974. PMID 22057189.
- Mclaughlin PJ, Delevan CE, Carnicom S, Robinson JK, Brener J (August 2000). “Fine motor control in rats is disrupted by delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol”. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 66 (4): 803–9. doi:10.1016/S0091-3057(00)00281-1. PMID 10973519.
- Pietr MD, Knutsen PM, Shore DI, Ahissar E, Vogel Z (November 2010). “Cannabinoids reveal separate controls for whisking amplitude and timing in rats”. Journal of Neurophysiology. 104 (5): 2532–42. doi:10.1152/jn.01039.2009. PMID 20844105.
- De Vries TJ, Schoffelmeer AN (August 2005). “Cannabinoid CB1 receptors control conditioned drug seeking”. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 26 (8): 420–6. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2005.06.002. PMID 15992935.
- Wiskerke J, Pattij T, Schoffelmeer AN, De Vries TJ (June 2008). “The role of CB1 receptors in psychostimulant addiction”. Addiction Biology. 13 (2): 225–38. doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00109.x. PMID 18482432.
- Melis M, Pistis M (December 2012). “Hub and switches: endocannabinoid signalling in midbrain dopamine neurons”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 367 (1607): 3276–85. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0383. PMC 3481525. PMID 23108546.
- Lopez-Rodriguez AB; et al. (1 January 2015). “CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptor antagonists prevent minocycline-induced neuroprotection following traumatic brain injury in mice”. Cereb. Cortex. 25 (1): 35–45. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht202. PMID 23960212.
- Leggett JD, Aspley S, Beckett SR, D’Antona AM, Kendall DA, Kendall DA (2004). “Oleamide is a selective endogenous agonist of rat and human CB1 cannabinoid receptors”. Br J Pharmacol. 141 (2): 253–62. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705607. PMC 1574194. PMID 14707029.
- Laprairie RB, Kulkarni PM, Deschamps JR, Kelly ME, Janero DR, Cascio MG, Stevenson LA, Pertwee RG, Kenakin TP, Denovan-Wright EM, Thakur GA (February 2017). “Enantiospecific Allosteric Modulation of Cannabinoid 1 Receptor”. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 8 (6): 1188–1203. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00310. PMID 28103441.
- Pertwee RG, Howlett AC, Abood ME, Alexander SP, Di Marzo V, Elphick MR, Greasley PJ, Hansen HS, Kunos G, Mackie K, Mechoulam R, Ross RA (December 2010). “International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXIX. Cannabinoid receptors and their ligands: beyond CB₁ and CB₂”. Pharmacological Reviews. 62 (4): 588–631. doi:10.1124/pr.110.003004. PMC 2993256. PMID 21079038.
- “PDSP Database – UNC”. Archived from the original on 8 November 2013. Retrieved 11 June 2013.
- WO patent 200128557, Makriyannis A, Deng H, “Cannabimimetic indole derivatives”, granted 2001-06-07
- US patent 7241799, Makriyannis A, Deng H, “Cannabimimetic indole derivatives”, granted 2007-07-10
- Frost JM, Dart MJ, Tietje KR, Garrison TR, Grayson GK, Daza AV, El-Kouhen OF, Yao BB, Hsieh GC, Pai M, Zhu CZ, Chandran P, Meyer MD (January 2010). “Indol-3-ylcycloalkyl ketones: effects of N1 substituted indole side chain variations on CB(2) cannabinoid receptor activity”. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 53 (1): 295–315. doi:10.1021/jm901214q. PMID 19921781.
- Aung MM, Griffin G, Huffman JW, Wu M, Keel C, Yang B, Showalter VM, Abood ME, Martin BR (August 2000). “Influence of the N-1 alkyl chain length of cannabimimetic indoles upon CB(1) and CB(2) receptor binding”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 60 (2): 133–40. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00152-0. PMID 10940540.
- Aung MM, Griffin G, Huffman JW, Wu M, Keel C, Yang B, Showalter VM, Abood ME, Martin BR (August 2000). “Influence of the N-1 alkyl chain length of cannabimimetic indoles upon CB(1) and CB(2) receptor binding”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 60 (2): 133–40. doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00152-0. PMID 10940540.
- Murphy WJ, Eizirik E, Johnson WE, Zhang YP, Ryder OA, O’Brien SJ (February 2001). “Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals”. Nature. 409 (6820): 614–8. doi:10.1038/35054550. PMID 11214319.
- Blanga-Kanfi S, Miranda H, Penn O, Pupko T, DeBry RW, Huchon D (April 2009). “Rodent phylogeny revised: analysis of six nuclear genes from all major rodent clades”. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 9: 71. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-71. PMC 2674048. PMID 19341461.
- DeBry RW (October 2003). “Identifying conflicting signal in a multigene analysis reveals a highly resolved tree: the phylogeny of Rodentia (Mammalia)”. Systematic Biology. 52 (5): 604–17. doi:10.1080/10635150390235403. PMID 14530129.
- Janecka JE, Miller W, Pringle TH, Wiens F, Zitzmann A, Helgen KM, Springer MS, Murphy WJ (November 2007). “Molecular and genomic data identify the closest living relative of primates”. Science. 318 (5851): 792–4. Bibcode:2007Sci…318..792J. doi:10.1126/science.1147555. PMID 17975064.
- “Cannabinoid Receptors: CB1“. IUPHAR Database of Receptors and Ion Channels. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology.