Trichome

How this document has been cited

The dissenting judge would not have remanded for an evidentiary hearing, but instead would have held that the defendant's consent must be obtained on the record before the magistrate may conduct voir dire.

Cited by

638 F. Supp. 333 - Dist. Court, ND Illinois 1986
292 P. 3d 715 - Wash: Supreme Court 2012
729 SE 2d 876 - W Va: Supreme Court of Appeals 2012
206 P. 3d 614 - Or: Supreme Court 2009
Or: Supreme Court 2009
972 A. 2d 293 - Conn: Appellate Court 2009
Conn: Appellate Court 2009
Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 2009
590 F. 3d 325 - Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 2009
Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 2007

Leave a Reply