How this document has been cited
On habeas corpus where the judgment and sentence of a circuit court are returned as the cause for the detention of the petitioner, the only matter that can be inquired into is the jurisdiction of the said circuit court to render the judgment and impose the sentence that was imposed.
- in Tadlock v. State, 1963 and 9 similar citations
—the defendant' s right to represent himself was often the predicate for upholding the waiver of an important right.
- in Martinez v. Court of Appeal of Cal., Fourth Appellate Dist., 2000 and 4 similar citations
Appellant's argument in the court below and here that court appointed counsel representing him upon the trial was "inadequate," raises no jurisdictional question.
- in Argo v. State, 1961 and one similar citation
In brief, petitioner asserts that the refusal of a continuance under the circumstances was a violation of his constitutional rights of due process and equal protection under the law.[1] There is nothing in the record before us which tends to show that the prisoner requested or was refused a continuance because of the absence of counsel.
- in Report of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Alabama and one similar citation
Many of the cases cited by Faretta contain no more than a passing reference to a right of self-representation on the way to a holding that a defendant' s waiver of counsel was valid.
- in BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE LEGAL FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF … and one similar citation
Cited by
145 F. 2d 272 - Circuit Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 1944
133 So. 2d 201 - Ala: Court of Appeals 1961
528 US 152 - Supreme Court 2000
426 So. 2d 524 - Ala: Court of Criminal Appeals 1983
152 So. 2d 429 - Ala: Court of Appeals 1963
142 So. 2d 678 - Ala: Court of Appeals 1962
140 So. 2d 294 - Ala: Court of Appeals 1962
132 So. 2d 327 - Ala: Court of Appeals 1961
KS SCHEIDEGGER -
[BOOK] The Supreme Court
HL Wagner… - 2007