About 99 results (0.05 sec)
Hyde v. United States
225 US 347, 32 S. Ct. 793, 56 L. Ed. 1114 - Supreme Court, 1912 - Google Scholar
Before proceeding to consider the indictment it may be well to state the laws and conditions to
which the conspiracy charged in the indictment relates. By acts of Congress dated …
which the conspiracy charged in the indictment relates. By acts of Congress dated …
Savage v. Jones
225 US 501, 32 S. Ct. 715, 56 L. Ed. 1182 - Supreme Court, 1912 - Google Scholar
A preliminary question arises with respect to the jurisdiction of this court, by reason of the allegation
of the bill that the complainant's product is not a "concentrated commercial feeding stuff" within …
of the bill that the complainant's product is not a "concentrated commercial feeding stuff" within …
Messenger v. Anderson
225 US 436, 32 S. Ct. 739, 56 L. Ed. 1152 - Supreme Court, 1912 - Google Scholar
This is an action of ejectment for land in Toledo, Ohio, 442 brought by the respondent,
Anderson. The case went three times to the Circuit Court of Appeals, and ended in a judgment …
Anderson. The case went three times to the Circuit Court of Appeals, and ended in a judgment …
Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.
225 US 111, 32 S. Ct. 641, 56 L. Ed. 1009 - Supreme Court, 1912 - Google Scholar
The Old Dominion Copper and Smelting Company, hereafter designated the Copper
Company, a corporation 125 of New Jersey, filed two bills in an equity court of Massachusetts …
Company, a corporation 125 of New Jersey, filed two bills in an equity court of Massachusetts …
Shulthis v. McDougal
225 US 561, 32 S. Ct. 704, 56 L. Ed. 1205 - Supreme Court, 1912 - Google Scholar
The complainant, Shulthis, is a citizen of Kansas. One of the defendants, the Kiefer Oil and Gas
Company, is a corporation organized in the Indian Territory under the Arkansas statutes which …
Company, is a corporation organized in the Indian Territory under the Arkansas statutes which …
Johannessen v. United States
225 US 227, 32 S. Ct. 613, 56 L. Ed. 1066 - Supreme Court, 1912 - Google Scholar
"First. He shall declare on oath, before a circuit or district court of the United States, or a district
or supreme court of the Territories, or a court of record of any of the States having common-law …
or supreme court of the Territories, or a court of record of any of the States having common-law …
Low Wah Suey v. Backus
225 US 460, 32 S. Ct. 734, 56 L. Ed. 1165 - Supreme Court, 1912 - Google Scholar
Li A. Sim, a Chinese woman, wife of Low Wah Suey, was ordered to be deported by the Department
of Commerce and Labor, a hearing having been had before an immigration inspector at San …
of Commerce and Labor, a hearing having been had before an immigration inspector at San …
Sexton v. Kessler & Co.
225 US 90, 32 S. Ct. 657, 56 L. Ed. 995 - Supreme Court, 1912 - Google Scholar
This is a bill brought by a trustee in bankruptcy to set aside an alleged fraudulent preference.
The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a decree of the District Court for the plaintiffs and dismissed …
The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a decree of the District Court for the plaintiffs and dismissed …
Murphy v. California
225 US 623, 32 S. Ct. 697, 56 L. Ed. 1229 - Supreme Court, 1912 - Google Scholar
The plaintiff in error was arrested on the charge of 628 violating this ordinance. His application
for a writ of habeas corpus was denied by the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court of the …
for a writ of habeas corpus was denied by the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court of the …
Westinghouse Co. v. Wagner Mfg. Co.
225 US 604, 32 S. Ct. 691, 56 L. Ed. 1222 - Supreme Court, 1912 - Google Scholar
The statute makes the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals final in patent cases, and the plaintiff's
petition for the writ of certiorari herein was not granted for the 614 purpose of reexamining the …
petition for the writ of certiorari herein was not granted for the 614 purpose of reexamining the …