Trichome

TERRETT & OTHERS v. Taylor & others

13 US 43, 3 L. Ed. 650 - Supreme Court, 1815 - Google Scholar
If the Plaintiffs have shown a sufficient title to the trust property in the present bill, we have no
difficulty in holding that they are entitled to the equitable relief prayed for. It will be but the case …

THE NEREIDE, BENNETT, MASTER

13 US 388, 3 L. Ed. 769 - Supreme Court, 1815 - Google Scholar
In his test affidavit Manuel Pinto swears in the most explicit terms to the fact that Buenos Ayres
is, and always has been the place of his permanent residence; that he carries on business there …

30 HHDS. OF SUGAR v. Boyle & Others

13 US 191, 3 L. Ed. 701, 7 S. Ct. 490 - Supreme Court, 1815 - Google Scholar
The island of Santa Cruz, belonging to the kingdom of Denmark, was subdued, during the late
war, by the arms of his Britannic majesty. Adrian Benjamin Bentzon, an officer of the Danish …

The Town of Pawlet v. D. CLARK & OTHERS

13 US 292, 3 L. Ed. 735 - Supreme Court, 1815 - Google Scholar
The first question presented in this case is, whether the Court has jurisdiction. The Plaintiffs claim
under a grant from the state of Vermont, and the Defendants claim under a grant from the state …

THE MARY, STAFFORD, MASTER

13 US 126, 3 L. Ed. 678 - Supreme Court, 1815 - Google Scholar
Nanning J. Visscher, an American citizen, administrator of general Garret Fisher, deceased, went
to Great Britain in the year 1811, for the purpose of collecting the estate of the said general Garret …

Polk's Lessee v. Wendal

13 US 87, 3 L. Ed. 665, 237 S. Ct. 1829 - Supreme Court, 1815 - Google Scholar
The act of 1777, ch. 1, opens the land office of the state, and directs an entry-taker to be appointed
in each county, to receive entries made, by the citizens, of its vacant lands. The third section of …

Clark's Executors v. Van Riemsdyk

13 US 153, 3 L. Ed. 688 - Supreme Court, 1815 - Google Scholar
The Appellee filed his bill in that Court, praying that the Appellants and James Munro, Samuel
Snow, and Benjamin Munro, late merchants trading under the firm of Munro, Snow and …

Arnold and others v. U. STATES

13 US 104, 3 L. Ed. 671 - Supreme Court, 1815 - Google Scholar
The principal question which has been argued is, whether on these facts the goods are liable
to the payment of the double duties imposed by the act of the first day of July, 1812, ch. 112. That …

Evans v. Jordan

13 US 199, 3 L. Ed. 704 - Supreme Court, 1815 - Google Scholar
The language of this last proviso is so precise, and so entirely free from all ambiguity, that it is
difficult for any course of reasoning to shed light upon its meaning. It protects against any claim …

Ship Richmond v. United States

13 US 102, 3 L. Ed. 670 - Supreme Court, 1815 - Google Scholar
The ship Richmond, an American registered vessel, sailed from Philadelphia in ballast, in
December, 1809, with a clearance for New York, but proceeded to Portsmouth in Great …

Leave a Reply