Trichome

Hanover Star Milling Co. v. Metcalf

240 US 403, 36 S. Ct. 357, 60 L. Ed. 713 - Supreme Court, 1916 - Google Scholar
In No. 23, the Hanover Star Milling Company, an Illinois corporation engaged in the manufacture
of flour in that State, filed a bill in equity on March 4, 1912, in the United States District Court for …

Brushaber v. Union Pacific R. Co.

240 US 1, 36 S. Ct. 236, 60 L. Ed. 493 - Supreme Court, 1916 - Google Scholar
The right to prevent the corporation from returning and paying the tax was based upon many
averments as to the repugnancy of the statute to the Constitution of the United States, of the peculiar …

Badders v. United States

240 US 391, 36 S. Ct. 367, 60 L. Ed. 706 - Supreme Court, 1916 - Google Scholar
This case is brought to this court from the District Court under § 238 of the Judicial Code, Act
of March 3, 1911, c. 231; 36 Stat. 1087, 1157, on the ground that it involves the construction and …

Bullen v. Wisconsin

240 US 625, 36 S. Ct. 473, 60 L. Ed. 830 - Supreme Court, 1916 - Google Scholar
The facts are simple. Bullen formerly had lived in Chicago and continued to do some business
there after moving to Wisconsin, which he did in 1892. He kept in Chicago the bonds, stocks …

Butler v. Perry

240 US 328, 36 S. Ct. 258, 60 L. Ed. 672 - Supreme Court, 1916 - Google Scholar
"SEC. 10. Every able-bodied male person over the age of twenty-one years, and under the age
of forty-five years, residing in said county for thirty days or more continuously next prior to the …

Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.

240 US 342, 36 S. Ct. 370, 60 L. Ed. 679 - Supreme Court, 1916 - Google Scholar
It is not entirely clear upon what clause of the Fourteenth Amendment the court rested its
judgment. The equality clause was selected for special comment. After stating the limitation upon …

Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.

240 US 251, 36 S. Ct. 269, 60 L. Ed. 629 - Supreme Court, 1916 - Google Scholar
Respondent, an Ohio corporation engaged in the manufacture of shoes, filed its bill of complaint
on January 29, 1906, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of …

Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co.

240 US 103, 36 S. Ct. 278, 60 L. Ed. 546 - Supreme Court, 1916 - Google Scholar
As in Brushaber v. Union Pacific RR, ante, p. 1, this case was commenced by the appellant as
a stockholder of the Baltic Mining Company, the appellee, to enjoin the voluntary payment by …

Lámar v. United States

240 US 60, 36 S. Ct. 255, 60 L. Ed. 526 - Supreme Court, 1916 - Google Scholar
The plaintiff in error was tried and convicted upon an indictment charging him with having falsely
pretended to be an officer of the Government of the United States, to wit, a member of the House …

Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.

240 US 581, 36 S. Ct. 412, 60 L. Ed. 811 - Supreme Court, 1916 - Google Scholar
587 The contract authorized the Association, in the event of default by the Transfer Company
in the payment of any installment of money due, or in the performance of any other covenant …

Leave a Reply