Trichome

thcscience_admin
< March 13 March 15 >

March 14[edit]

Template:Gibraltar Second Division[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gibraltar Second Division is a former Division and hence no longer needed Zanoni (talk) 08:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep just because it doesn't exist anymore, that isn't a valid reason for deletion. It has 5 season articles links, which is enough links for a template. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:01, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Has enough articles at the moment. Others have yet to be created. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 12:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into {{Football in Gibraltar}} - I don't think this merits a separate article. GiantSnowman 12:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For consideration of the merge proposal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chris Evert start boxes[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and seeing as how Chris Evert is bombed was so many achievements templates already, it's good that there isn't yet another one. Gonnym (talk) 07:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete this is a single use template, and will always be a single use template, as no one else could use succession boxes for Chris Evert -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 15:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • substitute and delete, single-use template. Frietjes (talk) 19:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If this option is chosen, then I would recommend a bulk-nomination of all templates in Category:Tennis preceded and succeeded boxes for the same outcome. Letcord (talk) 19:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete as single-use. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Start U.S. Supreme Court composition[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after the templates that used these were deleted at two previous TfDs (which happened after the article they were used on was deleted at AfD). Template:U.S. Supreme Court composition row is used on only one talk page where it should be subst. Gonnym (talk) 07:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Emblems US-CO[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image template. Gonnym (talk) 07:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: This template is now being used.  Buaidh  talk e-mail 14:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Where is it actually being used? You just added it to a list of templates, which is the same as adding it to a category and saying its being used. Gonnym (talk) 14:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment {{Emblems US-CO}}, {{Emblem WM-US-CO}}, {{Emblem WP:COLO}} all have the same single usage, and appears to be some weird Userbox, otherwise I don't see why these three exist. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 15:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Convert both WP and WM to 2 Userboxes or delete all 3 if this isn't some weird userbox. Delete this one in any case. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 15:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:18, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not needed. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:16, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Emblem WM-US-CO[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image template. Gonnym (talk) 07:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: This template is now being used.  Buaidh  talk e-mail 14:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment this appears to be a weird userbox? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Convert to userbox or delete if this isn't a userbox -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:18, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete without converting There's no need to come up with last-minute redesigns to save unused templates. Just leave them to their fate. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not needed. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:16, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Global Open Initiative Foundation/Twi Wikipedia Translat-a-thon III/header[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused templates for an event that happened in November. Lack of incoming links also makes it seem like they were never used. Gonnym (talk) 07:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Grey's Anatomy to-do[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused todo list that hasn't been updated since 2013. Gonnym (talk) 07:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox nutritional value/unit[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:58, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-template of Template:Infobox nutritional value. Gonnym (talk) 07:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hockey at the 2022 Commonwealth Games – Women's tournament Match A1[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content merged with main article Hockey at the 2022 Commonwealth Games – Women's tournament. Section breaks used to transclude them into the various articles, rendering this template useless. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:49, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Terminal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:13, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except for one user sandbox and one other user page that is basically a test/demonstration page. This template has existed since 2010 but does not appear to be useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I'm agreeing that to be deleted. <includeonly></includeonly> on a <pre> is causing lint error. It's a useless template. Baris6161TURK (talk) 23:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Transwiki to Templates.Wikia -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 02:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You do understand that isn't even an option, right? Wikipedia has nothing to do with Wikia. Gonnym (talk) 18:36, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agletarang (talk) 07:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • substitute and delete, or move to userspace. Frietjes (talk) 15:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_14

Leave a Reply