Trichome

thcscience_admin


Jermboy27

Jermboy27 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
06 July 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Modus operandi:

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I hope this is the right place to leave a comment. Taking a look at this Commons noticeboard section, opened by me, you can find various details about the user's vandalisms that IMHO could be useful here also. After the notice of the user Mike Rosoft i've seen that the style of Jermboy27 here and the one of HorseWitch on Commons seems to be the same. Today he/she uploaded a picture this one, adding in the "Author" parameter the signature "Jermboy27" instead of HorseWitch. So I think there are no more doubts. IMHO crosswiki-vandal, also active vandalizing road signs pages on French and Polish Wikipedias. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 18:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

All  Confirmed matches, plus Jermboy272 (talk · contribs) and Din.thesign (talk · contribs).  IP blocked. TNXMan 13:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Tags updated. All accounts already blocked. Elockid (Talk) 15:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

18 September 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Road signs in Rafid (2), compare with Road signs in Rafid. Ben Ben (talk) 16:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
21 June 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


About a week ago I blocked User:Jermboytold for creation of unreferenced articles about road signs ("Badziki" being the last straw) and as a sockpuppet of User:Jermboy27. A couple of days later, he returned as User:Jermboytold2. I request a checkuser to catch potential other accounts and to block his IP address. (See also the history of the deleted articles.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

One sleeper found: Jermboytold3 (talk · contribs). Also,  IP blocked. Elockid (Talk) 21:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked and tagged. Tiptoety talk 07:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
04 July 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Obvious WP:DUCK and the fact that the IP's are from Perth and edit in the same area and pattern to Jermboy27. Bidgee (talk) 00:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Registered accounts indefinitely blocked and tagged. --MuZemike 23:44, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

20 August 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Jermboy's style, Road signs in Nepal is an hoax composed by British and Singaporean signs, user has been reported on Commons. Just to have an idea of the dimension of JB vandalisms, see Commons:ANV/Jermboy27. I hope it could be useful. --Dэя-Бøяg 13:39, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
7 September 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

The nth sockpuppets of Jermboy27. Same field of interest (road signs), recreation of the page Road signs in Nepal (created by his last SP Omegaelmo78), same style for road sign pages (when they are not hoaxes using normal US/UK signs for countries as Kuwait, they look like a Commons' gallery)... The "yield" in the name confirms that he is JB... It is a sort of mania of him for this sign. For further infos, see Commons:ANV/Jermboy27. Note: Yieldtheguy1 is also on Commons, see this deletion request. --Dэя-Бøяg 00:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • Agree this is him. Indeffing the socks and adding tags then closing.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 00:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
06 February 2013[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


A DUCK SPI since the behaviour and editing style/interests (road signs) is typical of Jermboy and his socks. Also uploaded images on Commons that links him to past socks. Bidgee (talk) 06:21, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • CheckUser requested - Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - I think a sleeper check might be helpful here considering the history. Note that there may be additional evidence on Commons - hopefully Tiptoety can take a look. Rschen7754 07:51, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Also obvious sock blocked. --Rschen7754 07:52, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sherilynne 15, Sherilynne wiki, and Roadsign132 are all socks of Sherilynne 55. I passed the CU data onto commons. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 09:57, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
8 April 2013[edit]
Suspected sockpuppet
Another sockpuppet of Jermboy27, indef blocked on Commons (for who doesn't know how is dangerous this vandal, i suggest this complete report). Same field, the road signs. Btw, this edits are normal but it is in the style of Jermboy to get smoke in the eyes. 11 edits to substitute a ".jpg" with a ".svg". --Dэя-Бøяg 22:30, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users[edit]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
31 January 2015[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


I believe Jermbollano is another sock of the Jermboy sock master. Besides the similarity in user name, this account has been making numerous edits related to road signs (Jermboy's main focus) and creating articles such as Road signs in Senegal which are clearly false. I believe this is an obvious case of socking. Furthermore, I believe that Bareyman61 is a sock of Jermbollano because they both have made the same edits to Comparison of European road signs adding the "No Equestrians" sign (1, 2). Bareyman61 has already been blocked for edit warring on that article and using an IP to evade that block. Fry1989 eh? 17:24, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Both of the above accounts are now globally locked. INeverCry 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • With both accounts globally locked, everything seems to be all set here. Mike V • Talk 00:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
18 February 2015[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


I believe this is an obvious sock, considering the similarity in name with Jermbollano who I did a report for 3 weeks ago. Also has edited Comparison of European road signs, and created their own road sign comparison table. I don't think a checkuser is required for a global lock of this one too. Fry1989 eh? 17:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • CU on commons confirms this is a sock, as it's on the same IP as User:Jermbollano and User:Bareyman61. I'll put the check on CU-L for a global lock of the acct, & global block of the IP if that's deemed necessary. INeverCry 04:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • Account blocked and tagged. Mike V • Talk 04:45, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
04 March 2015[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Another obvious sock with that user name, along with the associated IP. Both have been editing Road signs in Burma which is an obvious fake article. No checkuser seems necessary, please block both and delete the article in question. Also considering this has been the 3rd sock report I have prepared for this user in as many months, I would strongly suggest a range block. Fry1989 eh? 16:50, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  •  Clerk note:  Looks like a duck to me. Reallynotjermboy27 claims that he is "not Jermboy27 anymore" on his talk page [1]. The IP is editing the sane article, and other road sign articles, which we know is what Jermboy27 is interested in. Admin should block. By the way, what about User:Thenarioguy7? He originally created Road signs in Burma. The article was deleted [2] as a creation of blocked user Jermboy27, but Thenarioguy7 was not blocked, nor tagged as a sockpuppet. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:26, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I did not notice that username, thank you for spotting it. Fry1989 eh? 21:55, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
06 July 2015[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Recreated another article on road signs (Comparison of road signs of English-speaking countries) which had been deleted at AfD a month earlier, which itself was created by a confirmed sock of this master. Also username similarity. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • CheckUser requested - Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - per above evidence. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:54, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16 August 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets


User contributions and focus make this appear to be another Jermboy sock. They have uploaded fake road signs on Commons (this sign does not exist in the Philippine signs manual), as well as fake articles here on Wikipedia, such as Comparison of ATCMD-Influenced traffic signs. There is no such "Asia-America Traffic Control Manual Devices" as they call it. They are also adding it to templates incorrectly. I don't believe a checkuser is required per the Duck test. Fry1989 eh? 16:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - to compare Jecoman with Jeremyquann, the sock of Jermboy27. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jeremyquann (talk · contribs · count) and Jecoman (talk · contribs · count) are  Confirmed. Blocked and tagged Jecoman. Changed tag on Jeremyquann. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:34, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20 August 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets


The persistent abuse in the last 24 hours towards Comparison of European road signs, I can only ascribe to Jermboy. I had to file a vandalism report because it required immediate attention, but the IP has only been blocked for 2 days. I request a sock investigation, and ultimately a range block if it comes positive. Fry1989 eh? 19:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • No comment on rangeblock, but the IP is clearly a Jermboy sock, and should be blocked a whole lot longer than 48 hours. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:51, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanjagenije: Thanks for the policy link, I am aware that IPs are normally not handed long-term blocks. My comment is based on the other Jermboy IPs which, if blocked at all, have been blocked for one week, then one year when they invariably return: 203.97.254.233, 101.166.195.231. Nobody else has ever edited from this IP, it won't hurt anything to block it for a year right off the bat, but for policy. Best left up to admins, of course. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 21:04, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ivanvector: If nobody edited from that IP before, than there is a big possibility that the IP is dynamic. Blocking a dynamic IP for a year would be very, very wrong. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Regarding why I requested a range block, Jermboy is a long-term sockpuppeteer with no signs of getting tired of playing this game. The number of socks detected/verified on Wikipedia and Commons are extensive. Only a few days ago, I did a sock investigation for Jecoman and within a few days, there has been both IP abuse and the emergence of Jecomanisback. If it is believed that a range block would not be helpful, I retract my request. Fry1989 eh? 23:35, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


21 August 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar behavior, such as removing content from sign related articles. Pokechu22 (talk) 16:02, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

That's him. Hardblocked 3 months...he's been at this address for over a month. Closing.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 18:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21 August 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets


This is a new user account that has appeared in the last day and their first edits were to create a new road signs article. Per the Duck Test, that's evidence enough. If positive, delete the article as well please. Fry1989 eh? 18:22, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • The account is technically Red X Unrelated.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Behavioral evidence is not strong enough. Closing this case with no action. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Based on the IP that I just hardblocked for 3 months and the similarities, I've indeffed the above account.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 18:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

25 October 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets


This is a new user, editing within the last 2 days, and they are already creating nonsense traffic sign comparison tables and adding them to Template:Traffic signs. This not only shows user experience beyond that of someone with a dozen edits, it is a Jermboy calling card. Fry1989 eh? 18:03, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • The account is very  Likely. Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:02, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

27 October 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets


Obvious, just did a report two days ago for Barneyuj2. Fry1989 eh? 23:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

24 November 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets


User name makes this a Duck Test, per the last two Barneyuj branch-offs that I reported. Fry1989 eh? 19:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

14 December 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Username sockpuppet. Quack. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 01:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Barneyuj4 tagged and blocked indef per obvious behavioral evidence. Closing case for now. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

27 December 2015[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Yet another Barneyuj offshoot. Quack. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 04:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Additional information needed - @Electricburst1996: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18 January 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Per WP:DUCK. He's not even trying at this point. Amateria1121 (talk) 16:48, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

23 January 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Quack. See Barneyuj7. SummerPhDv2.0 15:53, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

31 January 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Quack. Another "Barneyuj#", same targets. SummerPhDv2.0 16:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

19 February 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

60.224.18.142 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

This seems to be also a Jermboy sock. Tracing its physical address, this is also another Western Australia IP. That Jermboy lives in Western Australia, and still contributes using anon IP's despite blocks and bans. Most edits are of road signs, but some are TV-related.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 14:08, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

27 April 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

72.93.87.56 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Per WP:DUCK, this seems to be another Jermboy sock. Same field (see his contribs on Commons, the blocks on dewiki), lots of notices on his talk. Btw, I reverted this edits about European road signs (ps: followed by this vandalism). --Dэя-Бøяg 00:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note his contribs about DDR signs (on commons,on dewiki), done in the same perido of this vandalisms (both vandals blocked: see 1st and 2nd). --Dэя-Бøяg 01:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • The IP hasn't edited since April 5. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 12:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

24 December 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


144.138.88.8 is a obvious sock of Jermboy27. They have edited many of the same articles Jermboy27 has, and have added the same content. Main interests are road-sign articles, and Australian football clubs. http://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=60.224.18.142&users=144.136.88.8&users=&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki The Editor Interaction Analyser shows many similarities between the last Jermboy27 sock and this editor. It is obviously a sockpuppet. 89.243.176.152 (talk) 12:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

04 September 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Made same edits to children's entertainment pages as User:Gohkenytp123 and a few other IPs. May wish to run a sleeper check against the one I am reporting and User:Gohkenytp123. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanjagenije:. This is one diff - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hi-Tops_Video&oldid=913907337, and another by User:Gohkenytp123 - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hi-Tops_Video&oldid=898604914. --IanDBeacon (talk) 21:15, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Additional information needed - @IanDBeacon: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13 November 2020[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Main interest is in roads, the other two socks have only ever interacted with Thent1234, adding unreferenced content and fake images of signs (uploaded onto Commons[3][4][5]). The style of writing and interaction is a WP:DUCK.

Also has been editing in non-road related articles[6][7][8][9][10][11], similar to Jermboy27, as are the usernames. Thegwh32 and Thent1234 edit summary style is similar, if not the same, both use Google Maps/Street View as a source Thegwh32 and Thent1234. This is also rather strange, as was this barnstars by Thevic1234 and the two[12][13] GA reviews done by a very new account (Altnr1), that Thent1234 happen to ask on the talk page. Lastly there has been some copyright/plagiarism been detected [14][15]. Since there seems to be new account (Altnr1 and seems to use different accounts before abandon them, Thegwh32 being one), a check of other socks and sleepers is requested. While this happened on Commons, they removed my comments on the likely being sock puppets of Jermboy27 and attempted a speedy deletion of the deletion page, but they have demonstrate the same lack of understanding that Jermboy had. Bidgee (talk) 11:44, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Hello Bidgee

I didn't know there was a user called Jermboy27 till yesterday. If Jermboy27 lives in Perth, and I live in Sydney, it's not the case. Also I am a huge Kylie Fan, and the other accounts i.e. Thevic1234 and Altnr1 are accounts of my friends borrowing my laptop. Thegwh32 has nothing to do with this, keep them out. Yes we all are new to Wikipedia and I don't think Thegwh32 even knows what Jermboy27 is. We both use Maps as our sources but yes we are separate and Thevic1234 and Altnr1 haven't cited anyhting yet.

Thent1234 (✉) 00:36, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jermboy27 was also known to edit from NZ IPs and Perth IPs but the last case that looked at IPs was in 2016 (so all we know is the sock may have moved or is using a proxy). There was enough evidence to point that there maybe a connection due to the editing style and fake signs. I highly doubt the other accounts are "friends", the editing style is the same as your own (including edit summaries). Bidgee (talk) 01:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Possible:
Thegwh32 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
No comment as to their relation to the master. Will hold off on blocking; I'll let another admin block after a behavioral investigation takes place so that the accounts can be logged and tagged appropriately. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:15, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked all. @Oshwah: can you forward this to Commons? Maybe also to stewards because this is crosswiki and there have been previous locks. --Rschen7754 06:50, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Commons admin here. Blocked, and then locked by Tks4Fsh for good measure. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:18, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20 November 2020[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

IPs are of Jermboy27/Thent1234 by passing the block, more evidence that the user changes IPs and possibly created new accounts, so a CU is required based of past behaviour. WAgoesalphanumeric is extremely suspect, the last sock openly admitted that they are from Sydney, as does the new account.

The explanation of the user name from both Thent1234[16] is also rather similar in style WAgoesalphanumeric[17], it is also interesting that an Sydney based Educational Institute IP attempted to vandalise a Thent1234 related page back in October (based off the filter log [can share the link privately to CUs]). Thent1234 also had mentioned they lived in Townsville, WAgoesalphanumeric added an item to an obscure draft page. Further more is rather experienced for a "new user", undone AussieLegend's revert of Thent1234's removal. Interests in Australian roads[18][19], along with the very similar edit summary and editing styles. Bidgee (talk) 12:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • I was convinced enough to do the block but I'll leave the request open for a sleeper check. --Rschen7754 19:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

04 December 2020[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Similar topic area i.e. [20] and [21], compare [22] and revert to same version, similar commenting style [23][24] Rschen7754 19:30, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also similar interests on simplewiki: [25] --Rschen7754 19:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Also found and  Confirmed:
Roadman1940 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Never goanna give you up fan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Stuarthwy87 from OpenStreetMaps (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Indef'd and tagged. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16 January 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Created on 24 December, AussieCoinCollector was originally known as RealLifeLorefan80 but was renamed on the 8 January 2021, the original name follows the same standard of naming we have seen in the past from Jermboy27. Although they have started editing in other areas (e.g. Australian coins) they have still edited in Australian road related pages (main and talk, [26], [27], [28]) and follows the same patten and behaviour as previous socks. They also state that they're from Sydney, in a contribution showed that they are from the same area as the past recent socks (can provide privately to CU, since I do not like to out the detailed location of editors) but they did create a template for the Western Sydney University and Western Sydney, which is in the area/region the past socks have stated they are from. The suspected sock's username signature is also of interest " wish the entire world's COVID-19 status was like Western Australia, 275+ days of no local cases :) " and editing WA relates articles ([29], [30], [31]), Jermboy's IPs in the early days were from WA (Perth).

The suspected sock has also been rather sloppy when it comes to editing ([32], [33]) including editing bios ([34], [35], [36], Joseph Pisenti (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Joseph_Pisenti) AfD) and creating road articles for roads that really don't need their own article and using Wikipedia as a source, editing a draft that one of their socks (WAgoesalphanumeric) had edited, which is the same patten (editing style) and behaviour the Jermboy socks have done in the past. What makes the case much stronger is the removal of Thent1234 name from the NT WikiProject, same style of GA reviews. I have had zero interaction with but they mentioned myself on their own talk page, gets involved in an old talk page discussion where they have mode zero contributions to and of interest add a template to a harrasment account (Jermboy created User:Bidgeeeee in November) and lists another other Jermboy27 sock (Barneyuj (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)) at User talk:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist. Also like the last sock(s), states that Google Maps/Street View is reliable.

I have requested a CU for any other sock accounts that have been created per past recent history of the sock master. Bidgee (talk) 05:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Dang, that is unfortunate. I'll have to stay aware of this editing pattern for the future. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 04:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Confirmed.
Also found and  Confirmed:
ACC (alt) (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Bagging and tagging sock accounts. This SPI can be closed... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:04, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

24 January 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


The last sock, BidgeeIsADictator was clearly a harassment account. This account has put, Bidgee Dictator [37] on User:Bidgee's talk page and username is also road related. Also edited Wagga Wagga as well,[38] which is a city (or town, it's kinda debatable but that's for another day) in the Riverina and is what User:Bidgee is interested in. Since the account is a vandalism only account, it needs to be blocked.

I would want a hard block on that IP address and request a CU check for any other sleepers.

(Also on a side note, the account BidgeeIsADictator hasn't been tagged. 14.200.144.191 (talk) 03:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • I've blocked the above account, it could be a joe job but is clearly up to no good. --Rschen7754 04:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You forgot to tag that account. 14.200.144.191 (talk) 05:01, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nothing more to do. Closing. Cabayi (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

02 September 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Account popped up a week ago and has pinged me twice in requests to make some route marker images that were created by Thent1234 late last year.[42][43][44] There seem to be some WP:CIR issues, which was an issue with Thent1234 as well.[45] Requesting CU to check for sleepers. –Fredddie™ 13:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: I added another account that mysteriously created some of the files that Mlik point was requesting and started using. Also added an IP that might be connected, though, I know you cannot comment on IPs. –Fredddie™ 03:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Milk point and Bdedbd  Possible to each other. ST47 (talk) 21:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.

  • Milk point Already blocked by Longhair. I don't think they're a Jermboy sock, though: They do not seem to be a native English speaker (or is very good at faking that), while Jermboy is either a native English speaker or a near-fluent non-native speaker (hard to tell due to some affectations). Road signs are a "special interest" for some people, and topics like that can lead to convergent behavior from unrelated users. As to Bdedbd vis-à-vis Milk point, it's more likely than not based on the timing, but that's not enough to block on without CU support. @Fredddie: Closing this, but if more evidence emerges with Bdedbd, feel free to refile (under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Milk point) and ping me. Thanks. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:22, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, Mlik point has been emailing me begging for an unblock. I've ignored all of their requests. It wouldn't surprise me if they've engaged in socking to edit again since I've responded on-wiki all that I intend to, and ignored the ongoing emails. -- Longhair\talk 04:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04 December 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Near-identical edits at Little Muppet Monsters and Muppet Babies to the globally locked master. Right down to the exact same incorrect SYNTH. Also similar obsession with street signs in the Middle East. oknazevad (talk) 09:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

31 December 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Same obsession with road signs and cartoons.

Heavily edited a page only maintained by other Jermboy socks (Special:Undelete/Draft:Comparison of road signs in the Nordic countries). This user quite often edits userspace drafts from his old accounts. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

who are not stale, and check for others. (CardeenilBoy27 is blocked as a sock of Kingwarnen (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), who is globally locked as a sock of Jermboy27 (see c:Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Jermboy27; Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kingwarnen should probably be merged here). Thanks, Spicy (talk) 13:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 14:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Working just from some hints in the CU logs and in cuwiki, I'd say that Foiledking123 and CardeenilBoy27 are  Possible or maybe  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to Jermboy27. Based on current CU data, RedaCEC is Red X Unrelated although there is some possibility that proxies are in use.  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. Since there's no good baseline for identification, I didn't attempt a sleeper search. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk assistance requested: - Looking at this again, I found some edits of RedaCEC which make me strongly suspect they're part of this drawer; blocking and tagging as suspected. I also note the naming similarity between Foiledking123 and Kingwarnen, and agree that the cases should be merged, which I'm leaving to a clerk. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:47, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Roysmith - the master is globally locked, and it looks like some of these accounts have been active on different projects - are you OK with me requesting lock on them all? Girth Summit (blether) 10:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Requesting global locks. Girth Summit (blether) 15:49, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13 November 2022[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

I initially raised the issue of the Fry1979 account on the comment page of inappropriate usernames, but with two accounts with nearly identical usernames to my own, it was suggested I bring the issue here. For the last decade I have been battling the Jermboy27 sockmaster. Many, if not all of their socks, have dealt with the subject matter I have chosen to make my field of expertise on Wikimedia (traffic signs). Both accounts have only 5 edits between them, but they have all been in regards to that subject. Fry1989 eh? 16:35, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Both accounts  Blocked and tagged. Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested; Closing. DatGuyTalkContribs 16:41, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22 January 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Ostensibly new user who has taken in interest in Jermboy27, repeatedly "correcting" location fields in the infobox, and posting on Philipnelson99's and on Elcobbola's user talk pages along these lines.

Could be an impersonator, and I'm requesting CU to establish whether or not this sock is technically related to other Jermboy socks. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This may be moot as the account was CUblocked after this report was posted here. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And it might be reasonable this to be moved to the relevant sockmaster. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Elcobbola: When I said "could" it was because I cannot rule out the possibility of it occurring. The initial block was as a probable sock of Join Instagram at Under 13, which on EnWiki has a different master, and I can't look at CU data myself so I'll leave it to the CUs (like you) to figure out a master. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This is an utterly bizarre rationale ("Could be an impersonator"). I am a Commons CU, and this is confirmed--data are here. En.wiki talk page hounding is characteristic of Jermboy27 socks (e.g., Roadsignschemes [47]; CardinalBoy321 [48]; etc.), and user has acknowledged ("Why do you always have be a snitch? I live in the United States! Not Australia!" (emphasis added). Эlcobbola talk 17:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

23 January 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

First and currently only edit is to, again, request WP:PROXYING of his imgur signs, same as just-blocked Seethesignsaroundyou. Compare also name to known socks like Gohkenytp312 (confirmed on Commons). Эlcobbola talk 14:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

17 February 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Name (compare Gohkingytp to previous socks Gohkenytp998, Gohkenytp312, etc.); same attempted WP:PROXYING of his imgur signs (compare to Seethesignsaroundyou [49], Gohkenytp998 [50], etc.); sole interest of road signs, etc. and, of course, confirmed on Commons. Requesting check as sometimes new accounts are created together. Эlcobbola talk 15:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Bbb23: You blocked the previous sock; can you block this duck while we wait for a sleeper check? Эlcobbola talk 16:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: - see now Hongkongboy223, just created. Эlcobbola talk 18:14, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, them too - blocked, lock requested. Girth Summit (blether) 18:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Girth Summit: Also the IP 170.75.174.113. I know you can't reveal the CU data on it but you can block them if it's necessary. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:36, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oop already got the lock requested before you did. Feel free to remove mine. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:44, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

18 March 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Name (compare Dukethewarnen to previous socks (e.g., Kingwarnen, Kingwarnenbackup, etc.); same attempted WP:PROXYING of his imgur signs (compare to Seethesignsaroundyou [51], Gohkenytp998 [52], etc.); sole interest of road signs, etc. Requesting check as sometimes new accounts are created together. Эlcobbola talk 14:06, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Bbb23: You've blocked previous socks; can you block this duck while we wait for a sleeper check? Эlcobbola talk 14:07, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Blocked, tagged, global lock requested. Bbb23 (talk) 16:08, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  No sleepers immediately visible but it's a big range and common UA so I can't be sure. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

30 March 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Similar behavior to other Jermboy socks, as well as editing other roadsign related articles other socks have edited. Obviously a sock of Jorco2 who is blocked on Commons as an LTA ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I'm going to throw in TheRealJermboy27 because they state on this SPI page (now reverted) that they are Jermboy27. They've also stated that they are Jermboy27 on Blaze Wolf's and Elcobbola's talk pages. Tails Wx 17:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

I've added Jorco2 to the list, who's edited at en.wiki as well.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Blocked, tagged, global locks requested. Leaving the CU request. Bbb23 (talk) 16:15, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd like to see a check of at least TheRealJermboy27 to rule out a Joe-jobber. If they are indeed a sock of Jermboy, then a global lock should be requested.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So these are the same user:

There's a whole bunch of older similar accounts which have already been glocked as Jermboy27. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:54, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14 April 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Confirmed, blocked and tagged. Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested-- Ponyobons mots 18:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closing, thanks. Spicy (talk) 20:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20 April 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

I was previously unfamiliar with Jermboy27’s modus operandi, but going through the previous SPI reports, this seems to be textbook behaviour. Only mainspace edits have been to road sign-related articles (they were reverted), and today they also created Draft:Comparison of Southeast Asian road signs. Or rather, I should say recreated with a concerning edit summary that implies they’ve been blocked before. ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 19:30, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Already blocked, lock requested. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 19:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I edit conflicted with you Spicy and had already tagged (which I self-reverted).-- Ponyobons mots 19:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks. I don't actually think it's a big deal whether these get tagged or not, but I didn't know that you intended to tag them. Spicy (talk) 19:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21 April 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Recreated Draft:Comparison of Southeast Asian road signs, more editing on road sign-related articles. ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 17:55, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Also Jeremyquann1998 is another obvious sock.-- Ponyobons mots 18:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20 April 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

This edit is very similar to other socks' edits, like Jeremyquann1998's and Aorco3. Tails Wx 18:27, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • That's an old sleeper.  Blocked without tags, lock requested, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 18:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

06 May 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Recreation of Draft:Road signs in Macau, previously created by known sock Kingwarnen; same addition to Yield sign as previous socks (see history - nine socks (!!!) in April 2023 alone); confirmed on Commons. Please check for sleepers as accounts often come in groups and for range blocks of underlying IPs (all VPNs) per NOP. Эlcobbola talk 17:08, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Blocking per DUCK, and requesting lock. They're using a new (proxy) IP, and I don't see any other activity on it, but it's obviously them. Closing. Girth Summit (blether) 17:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

26 May 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Same recent reactivation of long-dormant sock (compare to Myfanoflife, for example), same creation of draft road sign article (compare Draft:Road signs in Peru to previous socks' Draft:Road signs in Macau), editing of Draft:Comparison of MUTCD-based road signs (Wikilover1999567890, Jorcobackup, Jquann1998, etc.), compare username name to known Commons socks (Wikilover1999567890 v c:User:Wikilover19971236, c:User:Wikilover199876, etc.) Эlcobbola talk 14:10, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Ping @Bbb23: who often handles G5 deletions. Эlcobbola talk 14:32, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

11 May 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Unusually similar edit summaries, special interest in creating article Draft:Poudar and in Indo-Nepalese topics. Mikeanand (talk) 01:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Additional information needed - Mikeanand, you've indicated that their edit summaries are similar, but you haven't provided any examples. The archive for this case has lots and lots of socks, and opening their contribs at random to compare with the edit summaries by this account would be time-consuming - please could you give some examples of the edit summaries that you think are similar? I'll note that the most recent case in the archive is from 2015 - CU data will have been stale for a long time now, we need behavioural analysis to go on. Girth Summit (blether) 17:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • No response in several weeks. Closing without prejudice against a new filing with more evidence. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reopening. I can report that is  Confirmed to match a locked sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jermboy27. Tagging for clerk assistance to move this over there. Blocked the account. Courcelles (talk) 14:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk assistance requested: - Courcelles (talk) 14:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
     Done. The cases have been merged and combined into Jermboy27. Other than manually sorting out the history of the archived cases, everything else should be all set. Changing status to 'closed'. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Courcelles: I think this might be a false positive? Jermboy27 is pretty distinct from a behavioural perspective, and the IP shared between DataNepalis and the locked sock is a proxy. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah… you’re right. Behavior doesn’t line up. Courcelles (talk) 21:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oshwah: I don't understand why you merged this when the discussion above casts doubt on the fact that this is a sock of Jermboy27. Spicy (talk) 14:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Spicy - Sigh..... Because I'm a bonehead and I missed that. I'll undo my changes; thanks for letting me know. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    eraser Undone. Sorry about that, everyone! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

04 June 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Yeavyinstincts recreated Draft:Road signs in Peru G5 deleted a few days ago along with other drafts about other road signs such as Draft:Pedestrian crossing signs. WWBM created Draft:Comparison of traffic signs in former Warsaw Pact countries which Yeavyinstincts edited with both editing other road sign articles. S0091 (talk) 16:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

04 June 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Confirmed on Commons; recreation of Draft:Road signs in Peru (see Wikilover1999567890), same attempted WP:PROXYING at Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Illustration workshop (compare to Seethesignsaroundyou [53], Gohkenytp998 [54], etc.), compare username name to known Commons socks (Yeavyinstincts and Toadieinstincts v c:User:Yeavyinstincts2, etc.) Эlcobbola talk 16:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Ping @Bbb23: who often handles G5 deletions. Эlcobbola talk 16:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikilover1999567890 which I meant to file under this SPI. S0091 (talk) 16:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

07 June 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Jorco2023 has overlapping edits on the usual road sign articles, and has just recreated Draft:Road signs in Peru. 2A00:23EE:2678:4134:80F1:1CFF:FEA7:2ED3 (talk) 12:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Sock now blocked and globally locked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 12:58, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

25 June 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Recreation of Draft:Road signs in Peru and editing other Road signs articles. Rather Quackish but due to prolific socking another checkuser check may be warranted. Also similar name to previous socks Omegaelmo78 KylieTastic (talk) 17:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Added OniDonaldZans, whom I just blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Blocked Omegaelmo78alt and requested global locks for that account and OniDonaldZans. Leaving CU request. Bbb23 (talk) 18:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Nothing unblocked turned up on sweep. Closing. Courcelles (talk) 23:51, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

07 July 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Same exclusive focus on signs--e.g., Road signs in Chile (Marioman26, RonaldMcmanners, Goadinaloafofbread); Draft:Comparison of Asian road signs (Jermboy27altsmustdie, Jquann1998, Goadinaloafofbread); etc. And, of course, confirmed on Commons--check requested here for sleepers/assist G5. Эlcobbola talk 19:19, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Bbb23: who has helped block previous socks. Эlcobbola talk 19:20, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Courcelles:: FWIW, Jermboy27 nearly always uses a proxy, and it is not uncommon to see other bad-actors in the ranges (they are, after all, there for the same reason.) If you're not familiar with it, bullseye.toolforge.org is an excellent tool for IP information, including whether it's a known proxy. Эlcobbola talk 21:51, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Confirmed but you knew that already. The only previously unblocked/locked account I see is NGC 5139 GDPR 53 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser). Courcelles (talk) 19:25, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Courcelles: I'm confused. Isn't NGC 5139 GDPR 53 a sock of another master?--Bbb23 (talk) 20:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bbb23, They match perfectly to accounts tagged as this master as well as one tagged to Join Instagram at Under 13 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser) Courcelles (talk) 20:05, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    There also the previously blocked, but untagged 74-year-old juvenile criminal (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser) that should likely be included in the lock request. Courcelles (talk) 20:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Courcelles: See Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of CD -32 9396SSE + the history of HD 224693 going back years. These are all Jermboy??--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bbb23, Let’s see if I can explain. Goadinaloafofbread matches self admitted Jermboy sock Creamatedinstants and the tagged RonaldMcmanners. They also directly match the NGC sock I named above, the 74 year old criminal account, 15-year-old girl from Norway and a bunch of other tagged Jermboy socks. Now, working the NGC sock alone, it matches SCR 1845-6357. SCR is tagged on its talk page as User:Join Instagram at Under 13, which has its own Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Join Instagram at Under 13 as well as being tagged itself as a sock of CD -32 9396SSE. It’s a mess, but technically, they’re the same in current socks. Courcelles (talk) 20:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Courcelles: Sorry to be so insistent, but is there any behavioral connection between the NGC socks and Jermboy? I've looked back at the archives and can't find anything. Plus, there have been a ton of checks in this case - why did you make the connection now? Is it possible that other CUs have also noticed it but ruled it out behaviorally? Sorry again, but I can't wrap my head around it. I of course can't see the technical details, so I don't know whether the exact same IPs are being used or ranges of the same IPs or just geolocations; nor can I see how distinctive the UAs are.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:33, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bbb23 I’m an idiot. They overlap on the exact same IP and very close/version progressive UAs… but more digging indicates that IP is a likely proxy. So you can just ignore everything I said and assume they are indeed two separate sockpuppeteers. Courcelles (talk) 20:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Courcelles: Doesn't sound like you're an idiot if you had to dig to figure out the IP was a proxy. Obvious proxies are easy, but I've always found it hard to identify less obvious ones. Anyway, I've always been told (sometimes not to my liking) that behavior is the touchstone of confirming accounts and that technical data cannot trump behavior. In some instances, that's false (in my view), but not in this one (at least for me). Thanks for digging.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's been fun, but I think we're done here now. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 23:33, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

22 July 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Same road sign focus (e.g., Road signs in Chile - Gohkenytp6969, Goadinaloafofbread, RonaldMcmanners, etc.), attempted proxying (compare to Seethesignsaroundyou [55], Gohkenytp998 [56], etc.), compare username name to known socks (Gohkenytp696, Gohkenytp998, etc.) Эlcobbola talk 22:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

09 August 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Jermboy27. Again. Road sign focus--see, for example: Road signs in Turkey history. Found on Commons with a sleeper (GoldenKorea2009, not attached on en.wiki), thus request for check in case there are en.wiki sleepers. Эlcobbola talk 22:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Blocked, but I'll leave this open so a CU can run a check. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Two unblocked sleepers. Creoelements (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser) and Zyane is me (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser). Courcelles (talk) 23:53, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tagged blocked account. Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested for the sleepers. Closing. --Jack Frost (talk) 08:08, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

15 August 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

see previous account names and edits [57][58] Johannnes89 (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

19 August 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Same focus on road sign drafts, including recreation of Draft:Road signs in Macau. Similar name to recent socks (Ilovesigns626, Windows11lover1999, etc.) Эlcobbola talk 21:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Blocked and tagged. Leaving the CU request to look for others, particularly because this account has not edited on Commons, so Elcobbola would not have been able to run a check. Bbb23 (talk) 22:01, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Three accounts blocked and tagged. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

19 August 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Targeted a number of road signs articles, notably adding the nolines attribute to galleries while also having made meaningful contributions. I've reverted a number of the changes, but not all. These may or may not be the same user, I have included them due to extremely similar behaviour. For the 4th user I had assumed good faith, explaining so on their talk page.

Some of the articles affected (a number of which were previously affected by the same sockmaster):

Behaviour includes:

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
  • Hi, thanks for checking this out. What does this mean about the IPs, that they aren't related? EthanL13 (talk) 22:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Blocked and tagged the named accounts. Will check out the IPs in a bit. Bbb23 (talk) 22:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blocked Ilovesigns25262. Bbb23 (talk) 22:12, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The most recent edits by the IPs are from August 15. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 22:14, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @EthanL13: We don't usually block IPs unless the edits are very recent, and those by the IPs you listed are not. I don't need to look at the behavior, i.e., relatedness, if I'm not going to block anyway.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:33, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17 January 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

This account has been around for a decade but has gone inactive for different periods of time which might be why it never popped up in earlier checkuser checks. I was reviewing some expiring drafts, CSD G13s, for some roadsign articles that were created by IP editors all geolocating to the same European country. Then I saw that this account had participated in editing a few (like Draft:Road signs in Slovenia and when I went to check through Contributions, they seem virtually identical to the IP editors. I know you won't link IPs to registered accounts and beside, these IPs aren't active but I thought I'd ask about WWBM in case they are a previusly unidentified sockpuppet. Liz Read! Talk! 21:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have no more specific information than the fact that all of these editors have a very specific interest in creating articles about road signs all over the world and documenting them in table form. They shared that interest with the sockmaster here, that's all I was going on. Sorry to file this without a dozen diffs to support my suspicions. Liz Read! Talk! 03:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I am very familiar with Jermboy, as he has probably been averaging 3-5 socks per week on the Commons for years. 1) WWBM is not Jermboy. 2) Jermboy infrequently edits with his "true" IPs--an ipv6 that is currently range blocked (/32) on en.wiki and an ipv4 that is not currently blocked--but uses VPNs the vast, vast majority of the time. None of the listed IPs are the "true" IPs, nor have they been used by Jermboy on the Commons. I don't see merit to this request as presented. Jermboy's most recent sock attached to en.wiki is Archyofsideburns (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), if CUs are so inclined. Эlcobbola talk 01:11, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • I'll note WWBM (talk · contribs) was checked on 4 June and found unrelated. @Liz: do you have any specific evidence, preferably diffs? DatGuyTalkContribs 22:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @DatGuy: I don't want to usurp your authority, but if it were up to me, I'd block Archyofsideburns, with or without a CU (assuming one hasn't already been done on en.wiki), and close with no other action.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bbb23: I'm okay with that. Archyofsideburns (talk · contribs) is  Likely FWIW. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blocked and tagged Archyofsideburns. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 13:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jermboy27/Archive

Leave a Reply