The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• T:TS → Template:Template sandbox  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A redirect of a type that is strongly discouraged. This particular one is almost unused (only two links: one from the creator's user page, and another from the target's documentation, which I've just removed). It is also confusing as Template:Ts is a different template altogether. – Uanfala (talk) 22:52, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak retarget to {{ts}}; otherwise delete as ambiguous and a CNR. — J947 ^[cont] 22:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  It would be more confusing having T:TS redirect to Template:Ts, but Template:TS redirect to Template:Template sandbox. There are a lot of links to the template sandbox, but not sure that a cross-namespace redirect is useful enough to be kept. Template:Ts has very few links to it. Peter James (talk) 21:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Yeah that would be confusing. Delete. — J947 ^[cont] 21:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Template:Ts, Template:TS, and T:TS, if all extant, should ideally target the same place. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 03:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Genius (2017 film) → Genius (American TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Quoting the move log: "this is a TV series, not a film". Genius (disambiguation) shows a few films released around that time, but none in 2017. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Genius (disambiguation), since there has clearly been confusion in the past. I'll have a go at cleaning up that page to bring film and TV entries closer together. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete in light of IP's comments below. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete None of the films came on the dab page came out in 2017 so I see no reason to retarget. As per the case of confusion mentioned assuming it’s due to the fact that the target article was originally titled Genius (2017 film) in April 2017 I don’t see that as particularly relevant since that was corrected a little over 2 and a half days later with apparently no dispute. Long story short any confusion is was dealt with years ago.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 06:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Little Alex Horne → Alex Horne  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This seems like more of a joke redirect than a purposeful one (a reference to the show Taskmaster, but not a term by which anyone regularly refers to Horne). I say Delete per pageview statistics, which show this page having only 3 pageviews in the past 90 days. Noahfgodard (talk) 16:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Taskmaster as it is a nickname used on that show as he is only "Little" with respect to Greg Davies. [1] [2] If he continues to use it outside of that context, as with Stuttering John Melendez then it could redirect back to Horne. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Article titles. The discussion itself has no consensus, but after noting that the "keep" vote is made out per a retarget vote, I think that retargeting is preferable to the default status quo result. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:How to edit a page/How does one edit a page/Name new pages → Help:Editing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nothing but redirects in the page history, so doesn't seem to be much worth preserving, and the current target doesn't discuss naming new pages. Bsherr (talk) 17:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - This seems awkward and unhelpful. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 19:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• This is a Very Old Page (created in April 2001), so it should be kept per item four in WP:RFD#KEEP. I think it would be most helpful if we retargeted it to Wikipedia:Article titles. - Eureka Lott 00:13, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per EurekaLott. --Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 05:19, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Wikipedia:Article titles; this is highly historical. — J947 ^[cont] 06:10, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wikipedia:How to edit a page already exists as a redirect. The redirect under discussion is rarely used [3]: I can't explain the increase in 2019, but the previous steady state indicates there can't be many incoming links. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Avoid deletion to avoid breaking links per K4. I don't see much of a reason to delete this either way; it is not that awkward or rarely used. Glades12 (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as implausible. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 04:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 7F15 → Principal Charming  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Production codes are a highly implausible search term. Besides, there is no guarantee the production codes are unique to one series, which may result in unnecessary disambiguisation pages. There is a slew of other production codes as redirects (7F16.. 7F24, 8F03..8F11) which, I think, isn’t very useful. Kleuske (talk) 13:46, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have used such search terms myself many times to search for Simpsons episodes and have found them invaluable. The Simpsons, unlike many other programmes, does not display the name of the episode in the programme itself and sometimes the title is missing from the Electronic program guide. Additionally, a different episode may sometimes be broadcast than the one advertised. In such cases, the production code displayed in the end credits is the only reliable way for the viewer to uniquely identify the episode. The question then is whether it is useful to take the reader directly to that episode or if letting them pick it out of search results is sufficient. I'm not aware of any duplication of these production codes but I don't see disambiguation pages as an issue even if they did arise. I've added many of these redirects as I think they are useful but will cease such activity until this discussion is resolved. --Jameboy (talk) 14:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have notified Wikipedia:WikiProject The Simpsons of this discussion in order to get further input. --Jameboy (talk) 14:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep - These appear to be helpful, though the potential for confusion exists should we find duplicates. I lean to thinking that deletion is the wrong call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Pott disease. Discussion was more of a no consensus, but redirect is preferable in the absence of any keep votes _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Tuberculosis of the Spine → Syphilis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"Tuberculosis of the Spine" isn't mentioned at Syphilis and I can't see why it redirects there. Possibly retarget to Pott disease ("Pott disease is tuberculosis of the spine"). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:14, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I concur, and I don't think the miscapitalization is worth preserving through retargeting. --Bsherr (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget; I don't remember why I created this (it was nearly a decade ago), but it seems, looking at it now, that Pott disease looks like the best target of this search term. — Supuhstar * — 22:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7 by Fastily following a tagging by the initial editor. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• CFA building → Court of Final Appeal  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Many different organizations are listed at CFA, so it seems inappropriate to have this point directly to a subset of them. I think that either deletion, or retargeting to point directly to Court of Final Appeal Building (which appears to be the only entry CFA-related building that has a standalone article) would be appropriate. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, sorry for missing this. I forgot that there were other orgs called CFA and could easily cause confusion. Thanks for reminding me! Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 00:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• T:S → Template:Strikethrough  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Created in April 2009 as a redirect to Terminator Salvation. The following month it was retargeted to the dab page TS, and a month a half later it was retargeted again, this time to Template:Spotlight (no longer existent). Then pass three years and two mass RfDs (1, 2, not individually discussed in either), and in 2012 the redirect is at RfD for the third time. The outcome is for it to be retargeted to Template:Strikethrough (matching Template:S), only to end up at another RfD mass nomination in 2013, where it was briefly suggested, but never enacted, that this redirect should be pointed back to mainspace. The next event is in 2014, when the community decided that T: shortcuts in general aren't a great idea.

So, keeping this redirect would be warranted if it has long history of significant use, but it doesn't come anywhere near. It's got about a dozen incoming links (as far as I can see, they're not uses, but are all mentions: in the context of deletion discussions and the like), and five transclusions (by two different editors), where it's used in the awkward construction {{:T:S}}, instead of the regular and simpler use of the actual shortcut {{s}}. Overall, the template is virtually unused, has no value as a template shortcut, and should either be deleted, or retargeted back to the mainspace. I'm requesting help in deciding the best target. It is attested as an abbreviation for Terminator Salvation, but aren't there likely to be alternative uses? – Uanfala (talk) 18:30, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom's thorough analysis, which demonstrates how confusing and ambiguous this redirect is. Linking to it requires more typing than the Wiki markup! Narky Blert (talk) 13:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete due to the complications described by the nom. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 03:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Just don't see this as the type of template needing a shortcut like this, not that many do. The long history of multiple targets doesn't help either. --Bsherr (talk) 22:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• *Andres Bonifacio (Pob.) → Andres Bonifacio (barangay)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Leftover from a page move. This is harmful, as a leading * is a wildcard character in the search engine, so having this interferes with the search function. Hog Farm (talk) 14:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete G6, unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unneeded. --Bsherr (talk) 22:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Anthony Bradbury. (non-admin closure) — J947 ^[cont] 03:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• *Cocoon → Batteries Not Included  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Besides the leading *, "Cocoon" isn't even mentioned at the target article at all. Old edit summaries suggest this may be a leftover of page move vandalism. Hog Farm (talk) 14:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per G3. The history of the target indicates that it was moved by a vandal account named Yogihead (talk · contribs) in August 2006. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• South Island(Sonic) → Sonic the Hedgehog (1991 video game)#Plot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Broken disambig qualifier. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete redirect with spacing error, noting that South Island (Sonic the Hedgehog) and South Island (Sonic) exist. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; useless to delete or bring to RfD and occasionally helpful. K4 and RHARMFUL apply. — J947 ^[cont] 19:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't imagine why there would be an incoming external link to this. When and how would this be helpful? --Bsherr (talk) 22:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Old English per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm (talk) 21:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Ænglish → English language  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Old English as the author of the redirect. Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 13:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• This was discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 24#Ænglish. Pings to participants: 1234qwer1234qwer4, Not a very active user, Rosguill. – Uanfala (talk) 17:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Support retarget per nom, seems to be a more plausible misspelling for Old English than modern English. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Support retarget per both. Johnbod (talk) 22:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Support retarget, plausible misspelling of Ænglisc, which redirects to Old English. Not a very active user (talk) 04:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Support retarget per nom. Very plausible misspelling of Ænglisc. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of languages by number of native speakers per SNOW. (non-admin closure) — J947 ^[cont] 21:05, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• List of languages by native speakers → Lists of languages by number of speakers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to List of languages by number of native speakers. Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 08:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy retarget per the nominator. This seems like an obvious call that doesn't need a week of discussion. Glades12 (talk) 09:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy retarget —Keenan Pepper 14:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy retarget - You don't need to ask permission for clear-cut things like this. Hog Farm (talk) 14:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  What about my topic ban on redirects? --Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 15:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Your topic ban is for for the creation of redirects. A broadly construed "topic ban on redirects" would also prevent you from editing them, and from WP:AFC/R and WP:RFD (which I am in favor of, but I digress). -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• List of ennsylvania Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas → List of Pennsylvania Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Bella Sylva, Pennsylvaia → Bellasylva, Pennsylvania  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I get it, "Pennsylvania" isn't an easy name to spell, and there's a bunch of plausible redirects from misspellings. But these...I'm not to sure of, since nothing seems to link to them, and they don't get very many pageviews. Regards, SONIC678 06:05, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unambiguously created in error. Useless clutter. Narky Blert (talk) 06:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Both highly unlikely errors. --Bsherr (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Is this the real life → Bohemian Rhapsody  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a likely, encyclopedic search term for the first line in Bohemian Rhapsody. Wikipedia is not a search engine. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, or is this just fantasy? dibbydib (T ･ C) 04:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Fairly weak keep, the first results on Google bring up this song, and so do those on Bing (although in the case of the latter the much more varied stuff comes much sooner). But if that doesn't work, any way the wind blows...doesn't really matter to me. Regards, SONIC678 05:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Put a gun against its head. WP is not a search engine. There are hundreds or thousands of songs with memorable lines, and Google and so on find them just fine. If a line is quoted in the article, the WP search tool will find it; if it isn't, the redirect points to nowhere with useful information. Narky Blert (talk) 06:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. This is the title of a book by Mark Blake (writer). Otherwise, I think this would be fine as a {{R from lyric}}. -- Tavix ^(talk) 11:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was article was created at title. Discussion is moot. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972 → Wikisource:Special:Search/Public Law 92-261  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Interwiki redirect in the namespace. Topic may be notable, it's a piece of legislation in the US with definite effects. WP:REDLINK applies. Over 4,000 pageviews in 2019. This is much better off having a redlink to encourage article creation than to send the searchers to Wikisource. Hog Farm (talk) 02:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete to encourage article creation per nom, who needs a soft redirect when an article'll do? (Just saying, that's a possibility.) Regards, SONIC678 05:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. This needs an article, not a redirect to screenfuls of statutory language; renowned as it is for keeping lawyers in gainful employment trying to work out what it means. Narky Blert (talk) 06:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The template specifically encourages article creation. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Close stubbed below the redirect. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 03:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – Per above. Even if a short article hadn't been created, I still would have supported keeping the redirect (and I could have sworn I posted a rationale days ago, but maybe I forgot to hit the submit button?), but regardless, the rationale for deleting is moot now anyway. Master of Time (talk) 07:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Betty May (Q18416435) → Betty May (actress)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Apu Ukil (Q42725596) → Apu Ukil  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Hosne Ara Begum (Q55694701) → Hosne Ara Begum  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Roksana Yasmin Suty (Q55694362) → Roksana Yasmin Suty  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Nasima Ferdushe (Q42725503) → Nasima Ferdushe  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Selina Akhter Banu (Q55694348) → Selina Akhter Banu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Parveen Talukder (Q14975807) → Parvin Talukder Maya  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Eleonora de' Medici (Q3721835) → Eleanor de' Medici  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nominating this batch of redirects that were disambiguated with wikidata identifiers as in this discussion. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep all as harmless (especially Betty May (Q18416435) per K4). — J947 ^[cont] 02:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all. There's {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}, and then there are redirects from unnecessary qualifiers no-one knows and few will understand. Confusing clutter. Narky Blert (talk) 06:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per this discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the discussion linked above and this other one. —Xezbeth (talk) 13:30, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete consistent with the discussions linked above. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all, confusing and useless clutter. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per the clear consensuses in the linked discussions above. Hog Farm (talk) 21:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• *Graham Miller (sports presenter/relief newsreader, late 80s - 1992) → Graham Miller (sports presenter)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• *Graham Miller (sports presenter/relief newsreader, late 80s – 1992) → Graham Miller (sports presenter)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Besides the long jumble of stuff, having the extra * at the front interferes with the search function. Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_April_17#*Graham_Miller_(sports_presenter/relief_newsreader,_late_80s_-_1992) kept the redirect as not harmful, but I didn't see any mention of the wildcard character interference in a quick glance over the discussion. This redirect is harmful because the leading * messes with the searchbar's wildcard character function. Hog Farm (talk) 01:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The qualifier is particularly ludicrous, it's almost a stub article. Narky Blert (talk) 06:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I found one more that I've added to this discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, incorrect on at least 3 different levels. —Xezbeth (talk) 13:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, multiple errors. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:52, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, unnecessary redirects. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• *West Los Angeles Baptist School → West Los Angeles Baptist High School  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Leftover from an old page move, the * isn't part of the stylization. Moreover, a leading * interferes with the searchbar, the * is a special wildcard character. Hog Farm (talk) 01:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Narky Blert (talk) 06:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good work by all those editors who are digging out these **** redirects and nominating them. Narky Blert (talk) 06:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Appears to be an unambiguous error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.