The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:16, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Mush puppy → Hot dog variations  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target article. I tried searching the phrase in Google and couldn't find anything relevant. BDD (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Puppy mush seems to be a thing but it has no article on Wiki so for now this should be deleted. JZCL 23:22, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:38, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Adaptive computing → Reconfigurable computing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Please delete, as redirect term is not mentioned within given target. Hildeoc (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. PC Mag's encyclopaedia describes "adaptive computing" and "reconfigurable computing" as synonyms, so I think the best solution is to add a sourced mention of the phrase to the target. Most of the mentions of the phrase in the encyclopaedia and most Google results refer to a non-notable company called Adaptive Computing, but the company isn't discussed in any depth in any article. (This is a weak keep because the target is beyond my level of computer-savviness, and there's the possibility that the phrase could be outdated or ambiguous.) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:24, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:36, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• WhitesCantBeRaped → Hashtag activism#WhitesCantBeRaped and EndFathersDay  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Target article does not include any mention of this redirect title. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 17:47, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Note I've adjusted the nomination to show that this targets a section of the target. 18:35, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
• Comment This was previously kept at Rfd in August 2014 (See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 August 7#WhitesCantBeRaped). The closure indicated that at that time it was mentioned in the article, but that the redirect would need to be revisited if it were removed. It was removed by BoboMeowCat in November 2014 [1]. Pinging the non-blocked participants of the previous discussion: @Steve Lux, Jr., MrX, The Whispering Wind, and Czarkoff:. Thryduulf (talk) 18:35, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not mentioned in the target. The hashtags were 4chan hoaxes [2], [3] so they don't belong in the target at all. 4chan or a spinoff from that article would not be an implausible target - if it were mentioned, but I can find no evidence of any coverage on en.wp. Thryduulf (talk) 18:41, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not an appropriate target because the hash tag was a hoax.- MrX 🖋 19:14, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.