The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 11:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Entenhausen, Andeby, and Andabær all redirects to Duckburg. This is a cross-language redirect. They should only redirect from the languages they officially come from. I say Delete. TheBlazikenMaster 10:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Instead of doing a cross-language redirect, it should link to Wikipedias in other languages when appropriate. FirefoxRocks 13:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was disambiguation page created – Gurch 07:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The concept of a white ninja is much larger than a nn wrestler's nn nickname from a long time ago. Most people, in fact, who go to White Ninja are probably looking for the webcomic, but that page has been deleted many times because editors usually view it as an advertisement. The redirect was originally pointing to a disambigulation page with white ninja (webcomic) in red, and people didn't like that because "it encouraged people to recreate the page for an nn webcomic". I agree, we shouldn't have a disambig page for red links, but I also think we shouldn't have this redirect. Rebent 16:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambig. In addition to Keiji Mutoh, I found two other articles that are potential targets for White Ninja (see White Ninja page for which ones). Recommend this be a disambig as they are valid search terms. -- JLaTondre 01:22, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Deleted (CSD G3). This was part of a series of redirects created by Mr. Monarchy in October 2006. I've deleted them all. -- JLaTondre 11:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously frivolous, from an account used solely to post several silly redirects. 81.77.183.202 22:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 11:48, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Rather POV surely? 81.77.183.202 22:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Highly opinional, and if someone were to type this in, they may be expecting a different monarch. POV violations. Cool Blue^{talk to me} 01:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for obvious reasons. --Ifrit 12:54, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - seems clearly POV. Unless someone can show that Elizabeth I is commonly referred to as "Britain's Greatest Monarch" (highly doubtful), this isn't a proper redirect. Nihiltres^(t.c.s) 18:18, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. bibliomaniac15 03:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: could be redirected to List of monarchs in the British Isles, and let people make up their own minds. :) Xtifr _tälk 21:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Answer That wouldn't make more sense. The best president of the United States doesn't link to the list of the presidents. That wouldn't make sense. I don't know why, but it just doesn't. TheBlazikenMaster 00:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Did I forget the <humor> tags again? Sorry. Still, it would solve the POV issue.  :) --Xtifr _tälk 20:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.