Trichome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Riana (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tamagotchi[edit]

This page, along with its relative pages Wikipedia:WikiProject Tamagotchi Part I and Wikipedia:WikiProject Tamagotchi Part II, have existed for about a month and in that time have had neither any members join or any substantive content added. I propose that they be deleted, or at least the existing three pages be merged into one, which with the minimal existing content, shouldn't be much of a problem. John Carter 17:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete inactive and never had any activity at all. Hut 8.5 17:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Is this some kind of joke? WikiProjects generally don't have end dates. Anyway, it's inactive. YechielMan 19:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I agree non active project, that does not even need historic interest tag. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ) 21:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete inactive WikiProject. Acalamari 22:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete due to inactivity—arf! 01:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Do we really have a use for a specific, inactive wikiproject? No. --tennisman 15:07, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply