The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Valoem/Laredo, Texas UFO crash[edit]

User:Valoem/Laredo, Texas UFO crash (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Killiondude (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:STALEDRAFT. Originally was an article deleted from mainspace then userfied, but no activity or improvement after 2 years. Typically we give editors a long rope, but it's doubtful any new non-fringe reliable sources will arise that would justify a stand alone article. LuckyLouie (talk) 23:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and close LuckyLouie has shown a bias against fringe related topics. I am allowed to retain such articles in my user space. Please close discussion and retain article. WP:NODEADLINE. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 18:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This has sat in Valoem's userspace for a good 2 years and 3 days after Valoem's !vote it's still sat there - They have no interest in doing anything with it and I don't see why it should sit there for the next 5 years .... either you're going to improve it and move it back or you're not ... Valoem clearly isn't so deletion is our only option. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 00:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I was tempted to suggest mainspacing and redirecting to the List of reported UFO sightings as I did with the Hopeh incident article, but the content and sourcing in this one is unacceptably poor and there would seem to be no hope of the content written here being used in improving either the list or in creating a standalone article. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 16:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom, original deletion nom, and User:Davey2010. No need to keep indefinitely. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 21:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.