Trichome

April 25[edit]

File:Joostvandebrug.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 13:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joostvandebrug.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fotografen associatie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Small, low-res, weird borders. Doubtful own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 04:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Just LEAD for web2.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 13:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Just LEAD for web2.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Interndpac (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The file is a poster advertising a campaign on Darfur of the organization Africa Action. Despite the main focus of the article is about the organization itself, the file is merely used as an illustration about the campaign, which is less related to the main topic. It is therefore argued that the file lacks contextual significance, and related information can be sufficiently conveyed by text. (In other words, a fair use of the organization's logo is more valuable than this file)
Moreover, the file is misrepresented by the fair use rationale and copyright tag for logos. The file violates WP:NFCC#8, WP:NFCC#10b and WP:NFCC#10c, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 04:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Justice Shri Kan Singh Ji Parihar Ji.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 13:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Justice Shri Kan Singh Ji Parihar Ji.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jodmar (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

scanned historical image of a (notable?) individual, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 08:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Antiwarbanner2003.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antiwarbanner2003.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Danspalding (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Source website has a non-commercial license likely doesn't own the rights to the banner anyway. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:16, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Leave a Reply