Trichome

December 27[edit]

File:Jerry Seinfeld.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 01:34, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jerry Seinfeld.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NetflixSoup (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

A copyrighted image whose non free image use rationale void due to presence of free image from a similar time period c:File:Jerry Seinfeld (1997).jpg and others at c:Category:Jerry Seinfeld DBigXray 03:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OSH2003 Cri-Cri F-PYTH.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:16, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:OSH2003 Cri-Cri F-PYTH.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BACbKA (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused in mainspace, missing evidence of permission FASTILY 06:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 01:25, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mirror Dinghy on Combs Reservoir.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mirror Dinghy on Combs Reservoir.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Billlion (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

missing evidence of permission FASTILY 06:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lama Yeshe Losal Rinpoche portrait.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:07, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lama Yeshe Losal Rinpoche portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Billlion (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused (personal?) image, no foreseeable use FASTILY 06:35, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • The subject of the portrait has Wikipedia article Yeshe Losal, I think the image was deleted from the article in 2016, supposedly as the image was no longer on commons. I dont understand why you write "no forseeable use"? I am no fortune teller so I am not sure if I would be able to predict its use or not! But there is a note (in the article history) that on commons, and on commons it was deleted as the source was listed as "Facebook"!! Seems like maybe that was a misunderstanding. I am pretty sure I took the photo at Samye Ling in 2006 as it says on the image, and I would say what I wrote then is more reliable than my memory anyway. Also the JPEG EXIF tag is my wife's camera at the time a Canon IXY. There is a close up portrait on the article but it is not clear to me that this one could not be used instead. Billlion (talk) 17:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Imam chart-nim.pdf[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:18, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imam chart-nim.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Md iet (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, not in an ideal file format, no foreseeable use FASTILY 06:35, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 01:25, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, may be deleted , as alternate files are available to fulfill purpose.Md iet (talk) 03:30, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WXXC47FWA.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 00:38, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:WXXC47FWA.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) 

Not Encyclopedic material and file was uploaded 10 years ago and has since been moved to another MediaWiki platform. Aeverine Frathleen Nieves (talk) 14:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 01:26, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Edwin Keeble architectural sketch for National Guard Armory, 1939.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 January 18. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edwin Keeble architectural sketch for National Guard Armory, 1939.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tom Foley Official Portrait (cropped).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tom Foley Official Portrait (cropped).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Svgguy5 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No evidence of "Official Portrait" - source shows "Associated Press" Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Leave a Reply