- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 15:47, 13 February 2010 [1].
Aurealis Award for best horror novel[edit]
Toolbox |
---|
Ok, basically the same as the recently nominated Aurealis Award for best fantasy novel (FLC) page with a few minor changes. There is an additionally sentence added to the lead commenting on the 'no award' situation otherwise thats about it. Salavat (talk) 14:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Could the name please be Aurealis Award for best horror novel? Since this is the main article for the award, the very bulky "winners and nominees" in the title is completely unnecessary. Compare with Academy Award for Best Picture.
- Im a bit reluctant to change the page as i based it of two previous FL mentioned on my previous FLC for the fantasy novel and the issue didnt come up for the last FLC. Maybe wait a bit to see if anyone else has anything to add. Salavat (talk) 03:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with Reywas, not so much because of the bulkiness but because it makes readers think that there's an article about the award itself. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:51, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sp. "hounarable"
- "No award given" is not a complete sentence.
- "Parenthesis" is singular
Great article overall. Reywas92Talk 21:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) Pretty good list, just a few comments:
|
- Support I see nothing wrong with the page. Afro (Its More Than a Feeling) - Afkatk 23:28, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Mm40 (talk) |
---|
Comment full review will be done, but please explain why there were no winners in 1996, 1998, and 2005. Mm40 (talk) 17:26, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Otherwise, this all looks good, and I'm happy to support. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 14:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.