Trichome

thcscience_admin
< October 13 October 15 >

October 14[edit]

Category:Socialist feminists by nationality[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is a new branch on the category tree and I would like it discussed. Personally I think it falls down on the wrong side of "trivial intersection". In what way is such a category needed? Geschichte (talk) 20:40, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a Socialist feminism article so whether this is a trivial intersection is questionable. In any case most subcats should be nominated for merger per WP:SMALLCAT. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Category:Socialist feminists was created in 2009 and has many subcategories. Subcatting by nationality is entirely standard, especially as the category is large (684 pages yet to be subcatted - the As seem to have been dealt with, Bratkowska is next in line). I do think it should 'Australian socialist feminists' etc (lower case). Oculi (talk) 21:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Oculi - the category is large, and there are various national traditions of socialist feminism which make intersections useful to my mind. I also agree with Oculi that 'socialist' should be lowercased. Though it's currently lowercased for some categories - e.g. 'Hungarian socialist feminists - many other are currently uppercased, e.g. 'British Socialist feminists'. Dsp13 (talk) 13:48, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • The lowercased ones are new since yesterday. Their creator should probably be asked to refrain while this cfd is in progress (lest they waste their time). Oculi (talk) 21:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree that 'socialists' in the subcats should be lowercased but that requires a separate nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This is a political category. Politics is different from country to country. Rathfelder (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- merging 54 subcats to the parent Category:Socialist feminists would swamp it. I do not think this is a trivial intersection anyway. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Socialist feminism is not trivial. Dimadick (talk) 17:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Don't see it as trivial. --Just N. (talk) 15:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:History of the Palestinian territories[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge and rename as nominated (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The parent category no longer has enough content to justify keeping a separate "History" sub-cat. Preceding period categories Category:West Bank Governorate, Category:Israeli Military Governorate and Category:Israeli Civil Administration do not have separate History sub-cats (although there is one for Category:History of Mandatory Palestine). This one was created in 2015 but since 2017 the "active" history category has been Category:History of the State of Palestine. – Fayenatic London 20:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:A.F.C. Fylde[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. ✗plicit 07:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To match the main article's name (AFC Fylde), per WP:C2D. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. unsure why this wasn't at WP:CFDS though? GiantSnowman 18:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename all per nom. --15:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kazakh women in politics[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 22#Category:Kazakh women in politics

Category:Establishments in the State of the Teutonic Order by century[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 27#Category:Establishments in the State of the Teutonic Order by century

Category:13th-century establishments in the State of the Teutonic Order[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: dual merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:40, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only 1 century category exists. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:East Germany–North Korea relations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 07:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Consider if this duplicates Ambassador categories for each nation? Whiteguru (talk) 10:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Whiteguru, I don't understand your nomination. There is a relations map and both countries did have diplomatic relations. Are you saying simply since there is a subcat we can't have the category? At some point in the future, I'm going to create this particular relations article. Is it because we don't have the main article, therefore the category is useless? Doesn't look that way. The category should remain. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Almost empty category. And there is nothing indicating long-term significance for this diplomatic relationship. Dimadick (talk) 17:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So are the rest of East Germany relations categories. The same is true for West Germany and for a lot of other countries. Deleting this category will set a bad precedent and will just be pointless to do so. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the East Germany tree is very poorly developed altogether and we do not consistently have these categories for every former country. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and SMALLCAT. --Just N. (talk) 14:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Obscenity controversies in opera[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: double merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overly narrow superlative. Only two entries, unlikely to be expanded. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:58, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_October_14

Leave a Reply