The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vishnu Shyam[edit]

Vishnu Shyam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable musical artist, fails WP:MUSICBIO. Lacks of significant coverage which are independent of the subject. We discourage for self published resources on Wikipedia. DMySon (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: as per nom. ~ Hatchens (talk) 12:47, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:50, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Delete as per nom, Indeed, no RS. Deathlibrarian (talk) 06:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• KEEP for now: as per some sources like this, this, and this, I am in my opinion to keep the page. Some more will be coming. If we keep deleting, after 1 year or so, the page will be leveled with GNG with un-disputed status. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 12:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The three references you provided above are from same news and it is only a passing mention. Unable to satisfy notability of the topic. DMySon (talk) 07:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My mentioned sources are WP:SEC, hence these are coverage. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 03:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: sources presented above are not significant coverage, he is only mentioned in them. Lavalizard101 (talk) 22:00, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.