- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 23:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There For Tomorrow[edit]
- There For Tomorrow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
At its current state, the article is a CSD under A7. However, the creators seem to be making a good faith effort to make the article conform to notability guidelines so I have put it on AFD instead to give them some time (a prod would obviously be contested). Maybe I should have just deleted it outright, but what's wrong with giving them 7 days? No vote.-- ugen64 03:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - References contributed on the talk page fail to meet WP:MUSIC for multiple non-trivial published works. I see only one, the Alternative Press article, that passes Wikipedia:Verifiability. dissolvetalk 05:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't pass any of the points under WP:MUSIC and is just in general not notable, but yeah SD under a7 too. tdmg 05:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above & nom. Onnaghar (Talk) 16:01, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.