- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Warlock (film)[edit]
- The Warlock (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Movie with no evidence of notability. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fulfills none of the parameters at WP:Notability (films). Also please see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Warlock (Film) created by same user, Fisaa7 within minutes after creating this article. --Shearonink (talk) 02:11, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- (Also, since this project has not been released WP:CRYSTAL would also apparently apply.) --Shearonink (talk) 08:27, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This doesn't pass notability guidelines and the only reference on the page was actually for another movie entirely (SuperBad). While I wish Fisaa7 well with his movie and his future filmmaking career, creating a movie doesn't give it automatic notability. If you visit this discussion, I'd like to point you towards WP:NFILM, which lists what is necessary for a film to be considered notable.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Delete. I originally requested this to be deleted under G3(hoax). Although it was declined, I still feel the reasoning still applies. No sources found, and most importantly the movie has not even been released. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 06:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think G3 applies here. It's not that obvious that there is no such movie in existence. With the stated filming budget (500 rand, that is, about $50 US), one should not be surprised by the lack of sources, reliable or not. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 07:12, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:N. —Ed!(talk) 16:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: "Everthing was filmed in a backyard. The effects are all made by Adobe After Effects." SL93 (talk) 23:45, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. —htonl (talk) 01:08, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.