The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Technically ineligible for soft deletion, but this has been open for three weeks and it does not appear any input is forthcoming and there is no argument present to keep the article. Star Mississippi 02:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Adventurer (1948 film)[edit]

The Adventurer (1948 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film appears to fail WP:NFILM, as only 1 book source cited and no others found in a BEFORE. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- Does not meet WP:NFILM criteria, and this is also obscure enough that if it's mentioned in another article (List of Obscure Egyptian Films, anyone?), it would be enough just to expand that a little and remove the full page. Also, are we sure that IMDB is a Wikipedia-worthy source? Vdbhi (talk) 20:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: as it's ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 19:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.