Trichome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 23:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tahir R. Andrabi[edit]

Tahir R. Andrabi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Yousef Raz (talk) 21:21, 15 February 2022 (UTC) "Withdrawn by nominator"[reply]

Delete , no WP:SIGCOV both sources are from a university. The two sources hardly qualify as "Independent of the subject" or WP:SECONDARYYousef Raz (talk) 21:29, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Passes WP:Prof#C5. Lack of coverage is not a reason to delete, it's a reason to expand the page with IRSs. Cabrils (talk) 21:55, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Is the deletion nominator here first nominating and then also voting at the same time to delete the article?
Comment Am I not allowed to expand my reason for nomination?Yousef Raz (talk) 22:11, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Cabrils as a straightforward WP:NPROF #5 pass, and suggest nominator withdraw the nomination. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 22:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply