The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Southwestern Washington Synod (ELCA)[edit]

Southwestern Washington Synod (ELCA) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SIGCOV and thus fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Propose redirecting to Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 18:39, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 18:39, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 18:39, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 18:39, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 18:39, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- This is equivalent of a diocese in an episcopal church, in this case with 82 or 90 congregations. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:10, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Peterkingiron, it still needs to meet NCHURCH and thus NORG, which it currently does not. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 11:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Why nominate this one for deletion and not all the others? -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Necrothesp, in my opinion it is generally good practice to test on a single article before nominating a series of articles for deletion. Series AfDs can be quite messy if done all at once when there isn't some precedent. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 13:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.