The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sophie Scamps[edit]

Sophie Scamps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no inherent notability from participating in a junior championship, WP:SIGCOV not demonstrated for her candidacy Ivar the Boneful (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Australia. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No where near sufficient yet to support GNG. At best TOOSOON. If candidacy is successful then another story ... Aoziwe (talk) 11:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete notable neither as an athlete nor as a politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:NPOL. LibStar (talk) 22:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. People don't get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they have not won — the notability test for politicians is holding a notable office, not just running for one — but the World Junior championships are not a level of athletics that secures automatic passage of WP:ATHLETE either. Obviously no prejudice against recreation after election day if she wins the seat, but nothing here is grounds for an article to already exist today. Bearcat (talk) 17:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the record an RfC related to NSPORTS determined that NSPORTS is just a guideline, articles still need to pass GNG even if they fall under NSPORTS, it is just a guide as to which articles are likely to pass, it does not function the same way as NPOL.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. For the reasons stated: fails WP:NPOL (not yet elected). Fails WP:ATHLETE. No SIGCOV (yet). Revisit post election. Cabrils (talk) 22:17, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete meets neither WP:GNG, WP:NATHLETE or WP:NPOL. The trifecta. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.