The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Poh[edit]

Sophia Poh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to fulfil WP:ECONOMIST. The 'citations' are press release related, not peers. Fails WP:GNG. Was dratified and yanked back into the mainspace. – robertsky (talk) 01:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Sources are not specifically about the subject.-KH-1 (talk) 02:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Singapore. Shellwood (talk) 02:25, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Ms. Poh is occasionally cited in the press, but single-sentence quotes do not establish notability. None of the myriad sources cited in the article provide her with genuinely significant coverage, and my searches in English and Chinese found only more of the same. Fails the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.