The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Solagran[edit]

Solagran (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable corporation, the page is full of promotional material. Broc (talk) 12:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Biology, and Australia. Broc (talk) 12:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: The article title is out of date, as the company has been known as Prenolica Limited since 2016: [1], [2]. I don't have time to dig through all the stuff that comes up for both of these names, but I'm leaning delete since all of it is routine listings or passing mentions. If we do keep, the article needs a complete teardown. It's disgustingly promotional. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete article primarily based on primary sources and not much in a google news search. Fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 22:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.