- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 06:34, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sheena Harrell[edit]
- Sheena Harrell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Ludicrously over-the-top biog of a Michelle Obama lookalike who is also the best violinist in the world and can even read music. OK, she looks like Michelle - but does that make her notable? Not as far as wikipedia is concerned. Fails WP:BIO and also WP:NPOV andy (talk) 08:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - completely fails to meet notability guidelines. Stalwart111 (talk) 11:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the article is nothing but blatant promotion (and unprofessionally written, to boot) for someone who has not yet achieved enough to be the subject of an encyclopedic article. Maybe someday, but not yet. See WP:PROMO. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Disregarding all of the content that is not neutral, she does not have enough notability yet.--LAAFan 17:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a WP:BLP1E. Her work as a violinist gets no coverage, and it is only her resemblance to the First Lady that has gotten her any coverage at all.[1] Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:02, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.