The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shadee Elmasry[edit]

Shadee Elmasry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems more like a fan-built/promo article about a non-notable "scholar" who doesn't meet WP:NSCHOLAR than anything encyclopedic. He doesn't appear to be widely cited afaict and doesn't appear to be notable otherwise. CUPIDICAE💕 17:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Islam, Egypt, and New Jersey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can’t see any basis for thinking this subject is notable, Mccapra (talk) 19:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I am the author of this article so I do not think it should be deleted. I did not write it to be a promo article, and I tried my best to put in reliable third party sources. -Jibreel23 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jibreel23 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I don't feel to say anything more than what Mccapra has stated above. ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 18:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. LibStar (talk) 22:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.