Trichome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 23:55, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sabbatical (TV series)[edit]

Sabbatical (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article about a dropped television pilot with no strong alternative claim to passing WP:TVSHOW. While this did get broadcast as a one-off special despite its failure to get picked up to series, that isn't an automatic free notability pass in and of itself -- it would still have to be shown to have WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage about it to establish its significance. But the only sources shown here are a single "pilot in production" press release from the producers and a Blogspot blog that isn't a reliable or notability-assisting source at all, and I can find absolutely nothing else on a WP:BEFORE search except glancing namechecks of its existence.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt a failed pilot from having to have much better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 14:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply