The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 01:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rocco Reed[edit]

Rocco Reed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantial coverage outside of adult industry publications. Does not appear to be notable. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I've heard of him. I go to Wikipedia to find out stuff about people I have heard of. If there is no information then Wikipedia is incomplete. Bosley John Bosley (talk) 11:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The statement above should be disregarded since it has no connection to wikipedia policy.TheFinalMigration (talk) 21:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: does not meet WP:BASIC / WP:ENT, per review of available sources.--K.e.coffman (talk) 01:36, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.