The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G3. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:54, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robinz[edit]

Robinz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources do not show notability guidelines being met. Fails WP:GNG Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This article for Robinz is a blatant rip off of the article for Harland Miller. This becomes even more obvious when you compare the first revision of Robinz to the latest revision of Harland Miller. Then what the creator of the article for Robinz proceeded to do is to change it slightly in an attempt to fool people into thinking it was a different article. What tipped me off was that the sources all mentioned Harland Miller, but none of them mentioned Robinz. I tried searching the internet for an artist named Robinz, but outside of a music artist on Spotify and an unrelated artist on Typepad named RobiNZ, I couldn't find anyone. This makes this article a blatant hoax and thus eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3. Lazman321 (talk) 16:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.