The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:G5. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reza Tiregar[edit]

Reza Tiregar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod that was removed-this was a borderline speedy for me. I can't do a BLP prod as he does have refs even if unreliable. Anyway non notable actor who falls under way too soon if ever. Wgolf (talk) 23:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Stay : More than 10 videos Has played Is famousY Seraltic (talk) 00:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No evidence of solid coverage. I've checked half of the film articles (including two that didn't appear to have articles), and none of them mentioned Tiregar. I can see "he played a major part in more than ten feature films" being a solid argument for notability, but when his parts are so minor that he's not even mentioned by those who create such pages, we should outright ignore them when considering notability. Nyttend (talk) 03:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment-he was only listed as 3 earlier. Not even sure if most of those are films. Wgolf (talk) 03:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • A lot are films, and they have articles; they just aren't linked. Nyttend (talk) 03:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've just added links. I guess I checked all four articles and two of the non-articles. Nyttend (talk) 03:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: The first 5 videos Solid reasoning.Based on Wikipedia:Notability (people) It is noteworthy  Resolved 79.127.72.185 (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete This article is based on fake sources. Like this. فرهنگ2016 (talk) 09:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Fake sources? He definitely exists, as he appears in the IMDB link for Hello Mumbai as one of the cast. (Also see https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4308471) The only obviously wrong information is his height, which has to be a good deal greater than 1.65 cm (1 in). So the problem with this article is that it has no reliable sources, not that everything's an outright fake. Nyttend (talk) 11:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is fake as even iMDB knows this person continues to add the name themselves to their website and that he hasn't appeared in a single one of the claimed films. Praxidicae (talk) 10:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Uh someone should probably look into the article creator Seraltic as a sock of Zahra 1369. 199.247.45.10 (talk) 10:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment فرهنگ2016 : Sorry, your comments are not valid The page has a valid source In the Internet Movie Database (IMDb) This person has nothing to do with the rest of the people, Your reason is totally unacceptable.  Resolved Seraltic (talk) 12:44, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a lack of reliable independent references (nearly all are IMDb), only seems to have bit parts , no notability established. Hughesdarren (talk) 13:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment some of these films are not even on the IMDB making this even more interesting and less notable. Wgolf (talk) 22:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment:User:Wgolf: You will see movie ratings on the site (Damascus Time)--(Salaam Mumbai)--(No Date, No Signature)All these videos Are noteworthy. Good job! Seraltic (talk) 03:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per G5 of an about-to-be-globally-locked vanity spammer.Praxidicae (talk) 10:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment:User:Praxidicae:Your personal hostility has nothing to do with the rest.Look at the edits of this page -- Mohammad Tiregar -- Intentional vandalism on your behalf, You took the money to make them a spammer. Seraltic (talk) 11:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's news to me, pal, I wish I got paid to deal with irrelevant vanity spammers. Also I definitely don't edit that garbage site you just linked to. Praxidicae (talk) 11:48, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed all the papers For these reasons were removed Machine translation was And the article has no problems.I hope your cooperation will increase on Wikipedia.To help Wikipedia, add articles.Do not try to With deception Delete it articles Seraltic (talk) 12:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seraltic These allegations are wholly inappropriate, you must strike them and apologise to Praxidicae at once. Failure to do so will result in your account(s) being blocked for disruptive editing and personal attacks. Nick (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.