The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restream[edit]

Restream (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, nor reliable sources that say otherwise. The only decent source I found after article cleanup was an Adweek article. Also raises UPE concerns. Cutlass^Ciera 21:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Insufficient depth-of-coverage from multiple reliable sources to meet WP:CORP. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:57, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.