The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Primeshow Entertainment[edit]

Primeshow Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, lack of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:NCORP. DMySon (talk) 14:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 14:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 14:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 14:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Does not meet NORG. Only one film production has an article, which is yet to release. -- Ab207 (talk) 08:23, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: An unreferenced article about a company. While the company does get some incidental mentions in articles about particular films and features on Niranjan Reddy, WP:NCORP requires that notability is demonstrable through coverage about the company. AllyD (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.