The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pole to Pole with Michael Palin. minimal participation, but was what the nom wanted anyway. Star Mississippi 23:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pole to Pole: The Photographs[edit]

Pole to Pole: The Photographs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seeking a redirect to Pole to Pole with Michael Palin as it's a collection of images from that television series. Not seeing any coverage that satisfies WP:BK. BriefEdits (talk) 17:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 17:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 17:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 17:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per nom. You should have been bold and redirected it instead of bringing it here, as it is already completely unsourced. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 18:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Plutonical: Fair enough lol. I'm not too familiar with doing that but I'll keep it in mind next time. — BriefEdits (talk) 21:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.