The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paper Money Guaranty[edit]

Paper Money Guaranty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly-referenced stub on a non-notable company. Of the three sources cited, one is the company's own website, and another doesn't work. A search finds nothing beyond a couple of blog entries and other passing mentions, press releases etc. content issued by the company, and the usual social media accounts and directory listings. Fails WP:GNG / WP:CORP. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Looks like a potential COI/UPE situation, the creating editor has only published two articles, on related companies; this one, and Numismatic Guaranty Company. I'll query that. Cheers, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:41, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Out of the 3 sources listed, 1 is dead, 1 is the company side, and 1 is a press release. Having done a google search, I can only find general company information sides, and what appear to be more industry press release. There’s no coverage in any notable newspapers.GeekBurst (talk) 16:56, 22 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete per nom. Run of the mill stories. Never heard of this company in SWFL. – The Grid (talk) 18:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 18:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete there is not enough coverage and what is there is not good, as other editor said above, dead, Press release, etc. Zeddedm (talk) 23:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As mentioned, article is Poorly-referenced, lack of significant coverage in independent websites. Misasory (talk) 20:50, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.