The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Self-draftified. Not yet fit for mainspace. I will work on it in the future. (non-admin closure) Tame (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pamela Whissel[edit]

Pamela Whissel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are inadequate for establishing notabilty TheLongTone (talk) 15:27, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Subject is a notable magazine editor and author. Sources Exist. Don't judge based on the article. Tame (talk) 15:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, Atheism, and New Jersey. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete There is no coverage at all. The references in the articles, one confirms she is an editor on Google books, one on muck rack confirms she is an editor and is news blog which is non-rs likely. The first reference is a profile, likely written by herself and the last one is not about her. scope_creep^Talk 08:52, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Scope creep, the last one isn't about her, but is used to back up the claim that she is the Acting Communications Director of American Atheists. Tame (talk) 15:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough but that doesn't prove notability per WP:BIO. There is no secondary coverage, barely any primary coverage on this women, at all. Nothing comes up that not related to her position. She is completly non-notable in the most basic sense. scope_creep^Talk 15:43, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep, I'm a regular reader of the American Atheists Magazine and many printed others, if you go to Scribd and visit the American Atheist Magazines, you'll see articles about her and editor's letters in every issues from 2013. Although it's primary source. And she is often talked about in the Skeptic and New Humanist magazine. She lacks coverage online, but there are some considerable amount in printed sources. Tame (talk) 09:43, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tame: The form is generally to put up at three secondary sources per WP:THREE that shows she is notable, so they can be examined by those who are taking part in the discussion. scope_creep^Talk 12:05, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.