The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There hasn't been any substantial source analysis, and the first opinion is by a now indeffed user. Sandstein 15:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia C2 (2020)[edit]

Nokia C2 (2020) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Sources are Nokia and a database of phone specifications Slywriter (talk) 17:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:40, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:40, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• KEEP as a simple click on "Google Search" and "Google News" gives SIGCOV. The article is not so great. It should be expanded. --NeverTry4Me - TT page 23:44, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:46, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spec page after spec page disguised as a review. The writers aren't even putting effort into the so called SIGCOV. So we take no effort webpages and turn them into no effort wikipedia pages to immortalize a device that will be in existence for a year.Slywriter (talk) 23:52, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Arunudoy. Additional notices may be placed on the article for improvement, but deletion does not seem to be in line with wikipedia policy. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 08:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep sources such as this one establish notability. NemesisAT (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to allow time to discuss RS/GNG complaint sources, not google searches
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 23:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.