- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 21:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
NTU ACES[edit]
- NTU ACES (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unremarkable cheerleading team. Might fail WP:N. tempodivalse [☎] 20:30, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Stub - A good deal of irrelevancy in the article (who cares that they have 7 roll mats?), though the national competition wins may qualify for independent notability. [1]. If not, maybe mention the verifiable bits in the main article on the university. Grandmartin11 (talk) 23:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tempodivalse =) I have attached two articles one from media and one from campus circulation which narrate the truth about NTU ACES, for the notability part that u have highlighted, but I can't understand the citation in wiki...as in i can't do the codes nicely...anyone please guide me on it to cite it better? Thanks--Wildfirex (talk) 07:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup, probably move to another title link Nanyang Technological University cheerleading or something like that. Looks like a sufficiently notable article in regards to the championships won. MuZemike 02:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.