Trichome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NIve[edit]

NIve (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability, no RS, previously rejected in AFC, Fails WP:SINGER

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:NIve_(singer) Marcdenis51 (talk) 12:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:05, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Draftify - might indeed meet notability criteria, but right now the article does not pass WP:VERIFY. Move to draft to allow the editor time to provide refs. Onel5969 TT me 21:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I've added some content and tidied up a bit, and while there is more work to be done, I think this comfortably passes WP:SINGER and WP:GNG. Searching for this individual is kind of a trek due to his usage of three different name since 2014, but there is quite a plethora of sources out there. Onel5969, please let me know what you think so far. plicit 12:19, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - nice job Explicit - my only concern was the state of the article and lack of refs, which now you've taken care of. Changing !vote. Onel5969 TT me 12:29, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply