Trichome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 03:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mission: Organization[edit]

Mission: Organization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a television show, not reliably sourced as passing WP:TVSHOW. As always, TV programs don't get automatic inclusion freebies just because they existed -- the notability test involves the reception of third-party coverage, in sources independent of itself. But the only "references" here are its own (deadlinked) self-published website about itself and a (deadlinked) TV schedule listing from 2010, which are not notability-building sources, and even on a search for archived media coverage that wouldn't Google I still just got television listings grids rather than any evidence whatsoever of analytical coverage by television critics. Bearcat (talk) 03:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply