The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 02:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Montana[edit]

Marcus Montana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable singer who had fifteen minutes of fame. PepperBeast (talk) 22:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 22:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This one is rather different I think. Certainly they fail NMUSIC, and GNG as a musician. But that does not mean they fail GNG absolutely. I was then tempted to delete on the basis of single event, ie, they were potentially notable for the underlying reason they failed NMUSIC. So why a keep. There is the initial (single) event in 1989, which did get non trivial coverage. Then they get non trivial coverage again in 2005,[1] again for the reason they fail NMUSIC. And then again in 2012 they get non trivial coverage,[2] again for the reason they fail NMUSIC. So, repeated non trivial coverage over a period of more than two decades. The subject is certainly note worthy for some people. I think the subject passes GNG for reason other than NMUSIC. Aoziwe (talk) 10:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I agree with User:Aoziwe's analysis. This article passes WP:GNG because of the subject's persistent notoriety, which was documented contemporaneously and subsequently via reliable sources.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for an odd notoriety that makes it notable enough for an article. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 21:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.