The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to College of the Ozarks. MBisanz ^talk 02:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

M. Graham Clark[edit]

M. Graham Clark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (academics) Grey Wanderer (talk) 23:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Grey Wanderer (talk) 23:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Grey Wanderer (talk) 23:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Although the College of the Ozarks probably doesn't qualify as a "major academic institution" for purposes of WP:NPROF crit. 6, a Newspapers.com search makes clear that Clark nonetheless passes the GNG: see, for instance, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. (I'll try to add some of these sources into the article, which is completely unreferenced at the moment.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:59, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to College of the Ozarks. Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. KidAd • SPEAK 00:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to College of the Ozarks.I had a look at the RS, it certainly features him, but not sure it establishes him as being notable for anything. There is definitely RS establishing that he was specifically important to the college, but I'm unsure that establishes *general* notability/GNG. Would be interesting to hear other's opinions. Deathlibrarian (talk) 06:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.