The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I don't think a third relist will help create a consensus here so I'm closing as No Consensus. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of swimming pools in Hungary[edit]

List of swimming pools in Hungary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough entries to justify a standalone list. There are exactly two entries on this list: Alfréd Hajós National Swimming Stadium and Danube Arena. And the only other article in Category:Swimming venues in Hungary is Debrecen Swimming Pool Complex. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Lists, and Hungary. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: probably fails WP:LISTN and lacks notability Justiyaya 08:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There are now three entries on the list, linking to their own articles. It is a valid navigational and information list. Dream Focus 14:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - As funny as keeping a 3-pool pool list article is, I fail to see WP:NLIST satisfied. Dream Focus's keep vote seems at odds with both WP:NOTDIRECTORY and the fact that Category:Swimming venues in Hungary exists to resolve those navigational needs. — Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Non nobis solum. 23:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTDIRECTORY does not apply, that's about including phone numbers, opening hours, etc., which this list does not. --Doncram (talk) 01:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates explains why you shouldn't delete a list just because there is a category. This list article shows far more information than a category can, so is more useful. Its short size is not a valid reason to delete it. Dream Focus 23:19, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. DreamFocus is right, including pointing to wp:CLNT. Better to have a list-article, helping to head off creation of stub articles on individual ones, or allowing their redirection to a row in this. Also, a swimming pool is a thing, and it is okay/good to have a list of them split out from main article, and okay to split that list by country. Combining all swimming pool lists would be too big, see Category:Lists of swimming pools. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doncram (talk • contribs) 21:52, September 19, 2022 (UTC)

The list has grown to cover 11 pools at 6 facilities, and there is a draft for a worldwide list at Draft:List of swimming pools which links out to separate lists by country. If it were in mainspace, merging this Hungary list would be a possibility, but this is probably already too large. Discretion has to be left for editors working in the topic area, when to split out vs. merge country lists. --Doncram (talk) 22:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Use categories until more notable names have emerged. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 14:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - meets NLIST per DreamFocus and Doncram. User:Georgethedragonslayer: see WP:CLNT. Ingratis (talk) 14:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep List is an improvement over categories thanks to the additional infomation in the table and the images. Has been expanded since nomination and so the rationale is no longer relevant. Garuda3 (talk) 21:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.